Peer assessing individual contributions in a group project
Peer assessing individual contributions in a group project
复制标题
同行评估小组项目中的个人贡献
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Gibson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Souto;CN Striolo;M. Vogel;R. Grammenos;M. Whyndham;G. Hughes;T. Kador;J. Britton;E. Mambetisaeva;M. Richardson;L. Albelda;I. Chester;F. Akinmolayan;M. Pollock;E. Bele;D. Wright;A. Gibson
毕业生不仅要有良好的学术知识，还要具备工作场所所需的专业技能。其中一项“软”技能是能够提出建设性的批评，并提供有意义但专业的反馈。当在行业内的团队中工作时，这一点尤其重要，因为同行需要相互影响以提高项目成果和成功的机会。在高等教育中，应该支持培养学生产生这种反馈的技能。具体来说，IPAC联盟调查了个人同行评估贡献在小组工作中的使用。在这种情况下，学生创造一个直接向他们自己的同龄人的输出（即一种面向外部的评估形式），并为学生在行业中的类似实践做好准备。这篇论文与Grindle和Tong提出的面向外部的评估圆桌会议有关，调查了员工和学生对这种做法的看法。本文介绍了迄今为止所获得的见解。
Graduates are expected to have good academic knowledge but also the professional skills required in the workplace. One such ‘soft’ skill is the ability to give constructive criticism and provide meaningful but professional feedback. This is particularly relevant when working in a team within industry, where peers need to influence each other to improve their project outcomes and chances of success. The development of student’s skills to generate such feedback should be supported within higher education. Specifically the IPAC Consortium investigates the use of Individual Peer Assessed Contribution to group work. In this context, students create an output directed to their own peers (i.e. a form of external-facing assessment), and prepares students for similar practices in industry. This paper, linked to the roundtable session on external-facing assessments proposed by Grindle and Tong, investigates staff and student perceptions on such practice. Insights gained to this date are presented.