You can't not believe everything you read.
You can't not believe everything you read.
复制标题
你不能不相信你读到的一切。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.221
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Malone,PS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gilbert,DT;Tafarodi,RW;Malone,PS
人们可以在不相信的情况下理解断言吗？笛卡尔（1644/1984）认为人们可以而且应该，而斯宾诺莎（1677/1982）则认为人们应该但不能。三个实验支持这样的假设：理解包括对所理解的信息的最初信念。 Ss 接触到有关刑事被告（实验 1 和 2）或大学生（实验 3）的虚假信息。一些 Ss 在负载（实验 1 和 2）或时间压力（实验 3）下接触到此信息。 Ss对目标做出判断（量刑决定或喜欢判断）。负载和时间压力都导致 Ss 相信虚假信息并使用它来做出有关目标的后续决策。用斯宾诺赞的话来说，这两种操作都阻止了Ss“不相信”他们在理解过程中自动相信的虚假信息。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016 APA，保留所有权利）
Can people comprehend assertions without believing them? Descartes (1644/1984) suggested that people can and should, whereas Spinoza (1677/1982) suggested that people should but cannot. Three experiments support the hypothesis that comprehension includes an initial belief in the information comprehended. Ss were exposed to false information about a criminal defendant (Exps 1 and 2) or a college student (Exp 3). Some Ss were exposed to this information while under load (Exps 1 and 2) or time pressure (Exp 3). Ss made judgments about the target (sentencing decisions or liking judgments). Both load and time pressure caused Ss to believe the false information and to use it in making consequential decisions about the target. In Spinozan terms, both manipulations prevented Ss from" unbelieving" the false information they automatically believed during comprehension.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)