Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive
Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: A review and research directive
复制标题
淡水中积极的生物相互作用：审查和研究指令
DOI：
10.1111/fwb.13476
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Brandon K. Peoples
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Samuel Silknetter;R. Creed;B. Brown;E. Frimpong;James Skelton;Brandon K. Peoples
种间正相互作用，如互利共生，互惠互利，促进是全球普遍存在的。虽然在陆地和海洋系统中的积极相互作用的研究在过去几十年中取得了进展，相对较少的淡水生态系统中的了解。然而，最近的进展使淡水系统中的积极相互作用的研究到了一个点，合成是必要的。在这篇综述中，我们对淡水生态系统中迄今为止所描述的各种直接的积极相互作用进行了分类，讨论了可能影响这些相互作用的流行和影响的因素，并为未来的研究提供了一个框架。在积极的相互作用中，生物体交换关键资源，如营养素，保护，运输或栖息地，以获得至少一个参与者的净利益。迄今为止，一些互惠关系已经得到了研究的关注，即种子传播鱼类，小龙虾和它们的外共生清洁剂，以及公共产卵的溪流鱼类。类似地，只有少数的亲合关系被研究过，主要是亲合关系。通过生态系统工程的促进作用受到了更多的关注，例如海狸的栖息地改变和鲑鱼的生物扰动。众所周知，相互作用的结果随非生物和生物背景而变化。然而，只有少数的研究已经审查了背景依赖性的积极相互作用在淡水系统。同样，积极的互动会产生成本和收益;从参与者的净成本/收益的角度对互动进行概念化将有助于澄清复杂的互动。很可能在淡水系统中还有许多积极的相互作用有待发现。为了确定这些相互作用，我们鼓励归纳自然历史研究结合从一般生态模型推导出的假设。关于积极互动的研究必须超越小规模实验和观察性研究，并采用跨尺度方法。同样，我们必须从简化系统到过度简化的两两互动，转向在更广泛的社区背景下研究积极的互动。积极的相互作用在应用淡水生态学中被大大忽视，但在保护，恢复和水产养殖方面具有巨大的潜力。
Positive interspecific interactions such as mutualism, commensalism, and facilitation are globally ubiquitous. Although research on positive interactions in terrestrial and marine systems has progressed over the past few decades, comparatively little is known about them in freshwater ecosystems. However, recent advances have brought the study of positive interactions in freshwater systems to a point where synthesis is warranted. In this review, we catalogue the variety of direct positive interactions described to date in freshwater ecosystems, discuss factors that could influence prevalence and impact of these interactions, and provide a framework for future research. In positive interactions, organisms exchange key resources such as nutrients, protection, transportation, or habitat to a net benefit for at least one participant. A few mutualistic relationships have received research attention to date, namely seed‐dispersing fishes, crayfishes and their ectosymbiotic cleaners, and communal‐spawning stream fishes. Similarly, only a handful of commensalisms have been studied, primarily phoretic relationships. Facilitation via ecosystem engineering has received more attention, for example habitat modification by beavers and bioturbation by salmon. It is well known that interaction outcomes vary with abiotic and biotic context. However, only a few of studies have examined context dependency in positive interactions in freshwater systems. Likewise, positive interactions incur costs as well as benefits; conceptualising interactions in terms of net cost/benefit to participants will help to clarify complex interactions. It is likely that there are many positive interactions that have yet to be discovered in freshwater systems. To identify these interactions, we encourage inductive natural history studies combined with hypotheses deduced from general ecological models. Research on positive interactions must move beyond small‐scale experiments and observational studies and adopt a cross‐scale approach. Likewise, we must progress from reducing systems to oversimplified pairwise interactions, toward studying positive interactions in broader community contexts. Positive interactions have been greatly overlooked in applied freshwater ecology, but have great potential for conservation, restoration, and aquaculture.
生态系统工程中被占用和废弃的结构对溪流群落的殖民化有不同的促进作用
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Tumolo, Benjamin B.;Albertson, Lindsey K.;Cross, Wyatt F.;Daniels, Melinda D.;Sklar, Leonard S.
通讯作者：
Sklar, Leonard S.
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Garrett W. Hopper;Traci P. Dubose;K. Gido;C. Vaughn
通讯作者：
Garrett W. Hopper;Traci P. Dubose;K. Gido;C. Vaughn