The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits
The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02724980042000075
复制
发表时间：
2001-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Klein, RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McLaughlin, EN;Shore, DI;Klein, RM
注意眨眼是一个强有力的发现，即处理一个被掩盖的项目（T1）阻碍了随后对第二个被掩盖的项目（T2）的识别，后者紧随第一个项目之后。关于T1加工难度与随后的眨眼之间的理论重要关系一直存在一些争论。在实验1中，我们以这样一种方式操纵T1的难度，即在不改变分配给其识别的资源量的情况下影响数据的质量。我们发现T1识别的准确性与眨眼之间没有关系。在实验2中，同样的难度操作被应用于T2，我们观察到与眨眼相关的加性模式。总之，这种模式的结果表明，数据有限的难度操作不会影响眨眼，无论是应用于T1还是T2。在实验3中，我们使用个体差异方法来显示传统的“流”式呈现（快速连续视觉呈现）中的表现与我们修改的“目标掩膜，目标掩膜”范式中的表现高度相关，从而允许将当前方法与先前使用流范式的许多文献进行比较。
The attentional blink is the robust finding that processing a masked item (T1) hinders the subsequent identification of a backwards masked second item (T2), which follows soon after the first one. There has been some debate about the theoretically important relation between the difficulty of T1 processing and the ensuing blink. In Experiment 1 we manipulated the difficulty of T1 in such a way as to affect the quality of data without altering the amount of resources allocated to its identification. We found no relation between the accuracy of T1 identification and the blink. In Experiment 2, the same difficulty manipulation was applied to T2, and we observed an additive pattern with the blink. Together, this pattern of results indicates that a data-limited difficulty manipulation does not affect the blink, whether applied to T1 or T2. In Experiment 3 we used an individual differences methodology to show that performance in the traditional "stream''-like presentation (rapid serial visual presentation) was highly correlated with performance in our modified "target mask, target mask'' paradigm, thus allowing for comparisons beyond the present methodology to much of the previous literature that has used the stream paradigm.