PROTEINS OF THE 14-3-3-FAMILY ASSOCIATE WITH RAF AND CONTRIBUTE TO ITS ACTIVATION
PROTEINS OF THE 14-3-3-FAMILY ASSOCIATE WITH RAF AND CONTRIBUTE TO ITS ACTIVATION
复制标题
DOI:
10.1101/sqb.1994.059.01.023
复制
发表时间:
1994-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
RUGGIERI, R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
FREED, E;MCCORMICK, F;RUGGIERI, R
Full-length human c-Raf-1 (Raf) fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain was used as the target of a screen for Raf-binding proteins, using a library of cDNAs fused to the Gal4 activation domain (Fields and Song 1989; Chien et al. 1991). Ten clones were identified that interacted specifically with Raf. They did not react with a fragment of APC (Fig. 1B), nor with the Gal4 DNA-binding domain alone. Three of the positive clones encoded members of the 14-3-3 family, of which two were distinct isolates of 14-3-3/3 (Leffers et al. 1993) and one was 14-3-3 ((Zupan et al. 1992; Fu et al. 1993). In additional control experiments, the 14-3-3 proteins showed no interaction with Ras (Ser-186) nor with p53 in the two-hybrid system (data not shown). The region of Raf that interacts with these proteins was determined using protein hybrids consisting of each of three regions of the Raf protein. The results are summarized in Figure 1. A Ras (Ser-186) fusion interacted with full-length Raf and with the amino-terminal region including CR1, but not with the middle region containing CR2, nor with the carboxy-terminal kinase domain (CR3)(Fig. 1). Both of the 14-3-3 proteins also interacted with the amino-terminal domain of Raf, and 14-3-3/3 displayed a similar interaction with the middle portion of Raf and with the carboxy-terminal kinase domain. Although interactions of 14-3-3~" with both the middle portion of Raf and the carboxy-terminal kinase domain were barely detectable in the/3-galactosidase assay, they were evident using the more sensitive measure of growth on medium lacking histidine (-His)(Fig. 1B). In general, 14-3-3/3 interacted more strongly with Raf than did 14-3-3~. Note also that the two distinct readouts of interaction in the two-hybrid system resulted in different impressions of the relative strength of interaction between 14-3-3 and different portions of the Raf protein. Some of this difference may be due to the fact that expression of the construct encoding the amino-terminal portion of Raf containing CR1 appeared to be toxic to the cells and might selectively affect the readout of cell growth on medium lacking histidine. In summary, both of the 14-3-3 proteins displayed some interaction with all three of the Raf fragments we studied. Given that there is some overlap between these Raf fragments, we conclude that at least two distinct regions of Raf appear to be involved in the interaction with 14-3-3 proteins: some portion of the amino-terminal regulatory region, and the carboxy-terminal region containing the kinase domain. In an in vitro assay, 14-3-3/3 did not compete with Ras p21 for binding to the Ras binding domain (Vojtek et al. 1993) of Raf (Fig. 2). Therefore, the region of the amino-terminal Raf fragment that interacts with 14-3-3 proteins is distinct from the Ras-binding domain. These results suggest that 14-3-3 does not compete with Ras for binding to Raf and that Ras, Raf, and 14-3-3 proteins may be part of a multimeric complex in vivo.