Using the Delphi and snow card techniques to build consensus among diverse community and academic stakeholders.

Using the Delphi and snow card techniques to build consensus among diverse community and academic stakeholders.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1353/cpr.2013.0033
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Trinh-Shevrin C
Trinh-Shevrin C
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rideout C;Gil R;Browne R;Calhoon C;Rey M;Gourevitch M;Trinh-Shevrin C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

纽约大学-纽约市卫生和医院公司(NYU-HHC)临床和转化科学研究所(CTSI)在其社区咨询委员会(CAB)和指导委员会(SC)成员之间使用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)和建立共识的方法来制定研究优先事项,以促进共享的研究合作。Delphi技术是一种方法,用于通过多方法、迭代的方法收集数据,从不同的角度和组织议程产生共识。与CAB成员进行了一系列在线调查,以从社区的角度确定健康和研究的优先事项。随后,CAB和SC成员被召集在一起,并利用雪卡方法缩小到共享研究合作的两个优先领域。心血管疾病/肥胖和精神健康被确定为社会决定因素框架内共享研究合作的健康差距领域。作为回应,成立了两个工作组,由代表纽约大学-HHC CTSI三个组成部分的三名联合主席提供领导:纽约大学教职员工、HHC提供商和社区领导人。德尔福方法促进了所有权和与社区合作伙伴的参与,因为这是一个迭代过程,需要利益相关者参与决策。雪卡技术允许组织大量离散的想法。这些成果通过确定行动步骤和建立解决两个健康差距领域的组织框架,帮助为整个CTSI研究议程提供了信息。这一过程有助于确保NYUHHC CTSI研究和社区参与战略与社区优先事项保持一致
The New York University- New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (NYU-HHC) Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) and consensus-building approach among its community advisory board (CAB) and steering committee (SC) members to formulate research priorities to foster shared research collaborations. The Delphi technique is a methodology used to generate consensus from diverse perspectives and organizational agendas through a multi-method, iterative approach to collecting data. A series of on-line surveys was conducted with CAB members to identify health and research priorities from the community perspective. Subsequently, CAB and SC members were brought together and the snow card approach was utilized to narrow to two priority areas for shared research collaborations. Cardiovascular disease (CVD)/obesity and mental health were identified as health disparity areas for shared research collaborations within a social determinants framework. In response, two workgroups were formed with leadership provided by three co-chairs representing the three constituents of the NYU-HHC CTSI: NYU faculty, HHC providers, and community leaders The Delphi approach fostered ownership and engagement with community partners because it was an iterative process that required stakeholders’ input into decision making. The snow card technique allowed for organizing of a large number of discrete ideas. Results have helped to inform the overall CTSI research agenda by defining action steps, and setting an organizing framework to tackle two health disparity areas. The process helped ensure that NYUHHC CTSI research and community engagement strategies are congruent with community priorities
DOI: 10.5465/255641
发表时间: 1974-01-01
影响因子: 10.5
作者:
VANDEVEN, AH;DELBECQ, AL
通讯作者: DELBECQ, AL
DOI: 10.1097/nnd.0b013e3182551543
发表时间: 2012-05-01
影响因子: 0.9
作者:
Harper, Mary G.;Asselin, Marilyn E.;Perron, Sarah
通讯作者: Perron, Sarah
DOI: 10.1136/oem.53.9.642
发表时间: 1996-09-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Harrington, JM;Calvert, IA
通讯作者: Calvert, IA
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00457-8
发表时间: 2000-08-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Schopper, D;Ammon, C;Rougemont, A
通讯作者: Rougemont, A
DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.7.504
发表时间: 1997-07-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
vanderBeek, AJ;FringsDresen, MHW;Houtman, ILD
通讯作者: Houtman, ILD