Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance.

Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.506
复制
发表时间:
2002-06
期刊:
The Journal of applied psychology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Vancouver;C. Thompson;E. Tischner;Dan J. Putka
J. Vancouver;C. Thompson;E. Tischner;Dan J. Putka
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Vancouver;C. Thompson;E. Tischner;Dan J. Putka

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管已有数百项研究发现自我效能感与表现之间存在正向关系,但也有几项研究发现,当分析是跨时间(重复测量)而不是跨个人进行时,两者之间存在负向关系。W.T.Power(1991)基于知觉控制理论预测了这种负关系。在这里,两个研究被提出(A)证实自我效能的因果作用和(B)证实解释。在研究一中,对87名大学生中的43名进行了自我效能感的分析游戏操作。操控与下一次试验的表现呈负相关。在研究2中,104名本科生玩了分析游戏,并报告了每个游戏之间的自我效能感,以及他们对之前反馈的评估程度的信心。不出所料,自我效能感导致了过度自信,从而增加了在游戏中犯下逻辑错误的可能性。
Although hundreds of studies have found a positive relationship between self-efficacy and performance, several studies have found a negative relationship when the analysis is done across time (repeated measures) rather than across individuals. W. T. Powers (1991) predicted this negative relationship based on perceptual control theory. Here, 2 studies are presented to (a) confirm the causal role of self-efficacy and (b) substantiate the explanation. In Study 1, self-efficacy was manipulated for 43 of 87 undergraduates on an analytic game. The manipulation was negatively related to performance on the next trial. In Study 2, 104 undergraduates played the analytic game and reported self-efficacy between each game and confidence in the degree to which they had assessed previous feedback. As expected, self-efficacy led to overconfidence and hence increased the likelihood of committing logic errors during the game.