The role of refuges in biological invasions: A systematic review

The role of refuges in biological invasions: A systematic review
复制标题

避难所在生物入侵中的作用:系统评价

DOI:
10.1111/geb.13701
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
Boon J
Boon J
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boon J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

所有的生态避难所缓冲生物体对压力源和调解一系列物种的相互作用。然而,尽管非本地物种的流行和影响越来越大,但它们在生物入侵背景下的作用尚未得到综合分析。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项系统的回顾,旨在确定在入侵文献中明确考虑的避难所的程度,并综合其功能。主要分类群全部研究。方法使用SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库进行文献检索,并按照系统评价和meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)协议进行检索。我们从300项研究中获得了315项生物入侵避难所的使用记录。从每条记录中,我们提取了有关实验设计、物种特征和避难所类型的信息。结果避难和避难介导过程在入侵文献中被广泛报道。本地物种通常利用避难所来避免外来捕食和竞争,空间复杂性和栖息地异质性是促进其共存的关键因素。记录显示,人工结构保护了外来物种在其引进范围内的生存。然而,在海洋和陆地环境中使用这种结构有关键的不同。此外,非本地植物和双壳类所产生的结构复杂性的增强经常被报道为其他物种的捕食避难所。基于避难所的过程的普遍性表明,通过先前描述的机制(即避难所介导的明显竞争和持续压力情景)或通过我们描述的机制(即当非本地物种使用现有避难所时),或两者兼而有之,避难所可以在影响非本地物种的持久性、传播和影响方面发挥重要作用。
AimEcological refuges buffer organisms against stressors and mediate a range of species interactions. However, their role in the context of biological invasions has yet to be synthesized, despite the increasing prevalence and impact of non‐native species. To address this, we conducted a systematic review aiming to determine the extent to which refuges are considered explicitly in the invasion literature and to synthesize their function.LocationGlobal.Time periodPresent day.Major taxa studiedAll.MethodsOur search of the literature was conducted using the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases and followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) protocol. We obtained 315 records of refuge use in biological invasions from 300 studies. From each record, we extracted information relating to the experimental design, species characteristics and refuge type, where available.ResultsRefuges and refuge‐mediated processes are widely reported in the invasion literature. Native species commonly use refuges to avoid non‐native predation and competition, with spatial complexity and habitat heterogeneity key factors in facilitating their coexistence. Records show that artificial structures safeguard non‐natives in their introduced range. However, there were key differences in the use of such structures in marine and terrestrial environments. Moreover, the enhanced structural complexity created by non‐native plants and bivalves is often reported to act as a predation refuge for other species.Main conclusionsThe ubiquity of refuge‐based processes suggests that refuges can play an important role in affecting the persistence, spread and impacts of non‐native species, either through previously described mechanisms (i.e. refuge‐mediated apparent competition and the persistent pressure scenario) or through a mechanism we describe (i.e. when non‐native species use existing refuges), or both.
由于本地捕食者的恢复逆转了松鼠物种的替代,栖息地中的入侵灰松鼠种群数量可能会持续下降
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Joshua P. Twining;W. Montgomery;D. Tosh
通讯作者: D. Tosh
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Utz;A. Slater;Hannah R. Rosche;W. Carson
通讯作者: W. Carson
生活在太平洋牡蛎礁上的蓝贻贝生存率提高和生长减缓之间的权衡
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Nina Eschweiler;H. Christensen
通讯作者: H. Christensen
DOI: 10.1890/14-0545.1
发表时间: 2015-04-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Iacarella, Josephine C.;Dick, Jaimie T. A.;Ricciardi, Anthony
通讯作者: Ricciardi, Anthony
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170027
发表时间: 2017-05
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Andradi-Brown DA;Grey R;Hendrix A;Hitchner D;Hunt CL;Gress E;Madej K;Parry RL;Régnier-McKellar C;Jones OP;Arteaga M;Izaguirre AP;Rogers AD;Exton DA
通讯作者: Exton DA