Adjunctive perampanel for refractory partial-onset seizures Randomized phase III study 304

Adjunctive perampanel for refractory partial-onset seizures Randomized phase III study 304
复制标题

DOI:
10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182635735
复制
发表时间:
2012-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
9.9
通讯作者:
Rogawski, Michael A.
Rogawski, Michael A.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
French, Jacqueline A.;Krauss, Gregory L.;Rogawski, Michael A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评估每日一次8或12 mg perampanel(一种非竞争性α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑-丙酸(AMPA)受体拮抗剂)与合并使用的抗癫痫药物(AED)联合治疗耐药性部分性发作癫痫发作的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT 00699972)。患者(≥ 12岁,尽管使用了1-3种AED但癫痫发作仍持续)被随机(1:1:1)分配至每日一次perampanel 8 mg、12 mg或安慰剂组。基线(6周)后,患者进入19周双盲期:6周滴定(以2 mg/周的增量增加至目标剂量),随后是13周维持期。癫痫发作频率的百分比变化是主要终点; 50%的应答率是欧盟registration.Results的主要终点:388例患者随机和治疗,387提供癫痫发作频率数据。在双盲期内使用该意向治疗人群,安慰剂和perampanel 8 mg和12 mg组癫痫发作频率的中位百分比变化分别为-21.0%、-26.3%和-34.5%(8 mg和12 mg vs安慰剂组分别为p = 0.0261和p = 0.0158)。安慰剂组、perampanel 8 mg组和perampanel 12 mg组在维持治疗期间的50%应答率分别为26.4%、37.6%和36.1%; 8 mg组(p = 0.0760)或12 mg组(p = 0.0914)的这些差异无统计学意义。68例(17.5%)患者停药,包括40例(10.3%)因不良事件停药。最常见的治疗后出现的不良事件是头晕、嗜睡、易激惹、头痛、跌倒和共济失调。结论:本试验证明,每日一次、剂量为8或12 mg的连续perampanel可改善不受控制的部分性癫痫发作患者的癫痫控制。perampanel 8和12 mg剂量安全,耐受性可接受。证据分类:本研究提供了I类证据,证明每日一次8和12 mg剂量的连续性perampanel对不受控制的部分性癫痫发作患者有效。神经病学(R)2012;79:589-596
Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of once-daily 8 or 12 mg perampanel, a noncompetitive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, when added to concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of drug-resistant partial-onset seizures.Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00699972). Patients (>= 12 years, with ongoing seizures despite 1-3 AEDs) were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily perampanel 8 mg, 12 mg, or placebo. Following baseline (6 weeks), patients entered a 19-week double-blind phase: 6-week titration (2 mg/week increments to target dose) followed by a 13-week maintenance period. Percent change in seizure frequency was the primary endpoint; 50% responder rate was the primary endpoint for EU registration.Results: Of 388 patients randomized and treated, 387 provided seizure frequency data. Using this intent-to-treat population over the double-blind phase, the median percent change in seizure frequency was -21.0%, -26.3%, and -34.5% for placebo and perampanel 8 and 12 mg, respectively (p = 0.0261 and p = 0.0158 for 8 and 12 mg vs placebo, respectively). Fifty percent responder rates during the maintenance period were 26.4%, 37.6%, and 36.1%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg; these differences were not statistically significant for 8 mg (p = 0.0760) or 12 mg (p = 0.0914). Sixty-eight (17.5%) patients discontinued, including 40 (10.3%) for adverse events. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, irritability, headache, fall, and ataxia.Conclusions: This trial demonstrated that once-daily, adjunctive perampanel at doses of 8 or 12 mg improved seizure control in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg were safe, and tolerability was acceptable.Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that once-daily 8 and 12 mg doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Neurology (R) 2012;79:589-596