Support-Person Promotion of a Smoking Quitline A Randomized Controlled Trial

Support-Person Promotion of a Smoking Quitline A Randomized Controlled Trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.012
复制
发表时间:
2011-07-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Zhu, Shu-Hong
Zhu, Shu-Hong
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patten, Christi A.;Smith, Christina M.;Zhu, Shu-Hong

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

戒烟热线和其他循证戒烟治疗在很大程度上未被吸烟者利用,限制了其对公共卫生的影响。社会支持与成功戒烟相关。因此,针对吸烟者社会网络的努力可能是促进戒烟热线利用的潜在途径。目的:本研究探讨了对有兴趣帮助吸烟者的非吸烟者进行干预的有效性(即,支持人们),以促进吸烟者使用明尼苏达州戒烟(R)帮助热线。数据收集时间为2007年至2010年,分析时间为2010年至2011年。设计:两组随机设计,评估支持者干预(n = 267)与对照条件的比较(书面材料,n = 267)。设置/参与者:入组了534名支持者(91%女性,93%白人)居住在明尼苏达州。干预:书面材料加上每周三次的电话会议,每次持续10 - 30分钟。基于科恩的社会支持理论,干预措施为参与者提供了所需的信息和技能,以鼓励他们的吸烟者致电QUITALITY Helpline.Main结果measures:参与者完成了支持提供措施(SPM)的邮件在基线和第4周(治疗结束)。帮助热线摄入工作人员记录吸烟者呼叫帮助热线,通过6个月的follow-up.Results:呼叫帮助热线的比例显着(p = 0.012)更大的吸烟者与支持的人在干预组(16.1%,43/267)比对照组(8.6%,23/267)。在调整与吸烟者居住在一起的支持者后,治疗效果仍然显著(OR = 2.04,95%CI = 1.19,3.49,p = 0.010)。在随机分配到干预组的支持者中,完成更多的会话与吸烟者拨打热线电话的增加有关(p = 0.004)。在调整基线评分后,干预组支持者在第4周的M +/-SD SPM评分(16.4 +/-3.3)显著高于对照组(15.3 +/-3.6),p = 0.002。结论:支持者干预可有效提高吸烟者对戒烟热线的利用率。有可能通过针对吸烟者的社会网络来增加戒烟热线的覆盖面。
Background: Quitlines and other evidence-based cessation treatments are greatly underutilized by smokers, limiting their public health impact. Social support is correlated with successful cessation. Thus, efforts targeting the social network of smokers could be a potential avenue to promote quitline utilization.Purpose: This study examined the efficacy of an intervention for nonsmokers interested in helping a smoker (i.e., support people) to promote smoker utilization of the Minnesota QUITPLAN (R) Helpline. Data were collected from 2007 to 2010, and analyses were conducted from 2010 to 2011.Design: Two-group randomized design evaluating the support-person intervention (n=267) compared with a control condition (written materials, n=267).Setting/participants: Enrolled were 534 support people (91% female, 93% Caucasian) residing in Minnesota.Intervention: Written materials plus three weekly telephone sessions lasting 10-30 minutes each. Based on Cohen's theory of social support, the intervention provided participants with information and skills needed to encourage their smoker to call the QUITPLAN Helpline.Main outcome measures: Participants completed the Support Provided Measure (SPM) by mail at baseline and Week 4 (end-of-treatment). Helpline intake staff documented smoker calls to the Helpline through 6 months of follow-up.Results: The proportion of calls to the Helpline was significantly (p=0.012) greater for smokers linked to support people in the intervention group (16.1%, 43/267) than in the control group (8.6%, 23/267). The treatment effect remained significant after adjusting for support person residing with the smoker (OR=2.04, 95% CI=1.19, 3.49, p=0.010). Among support people randomly assigned to the intervention group, greater number of sessions completed was associated with increased smokers' calls to the Helpline (p=0.004). After adjusting for the baseline score, the M +/- SD SPM score at Week 4 was significantly higher for support people in the intervention group (16.4 +/- 3.3) than for those in the control group (15.3 +/- 3.6), p=0.002.Conclusions: A support-person intervention is effective in increasing smoker utilization of the QUITPLAN Helpline. There is potential for increasing the reach of quitlines by targeting the social network of smokers.