Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: a scoping review and iterative synthesis.

Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: a scoping review and iterative synthesis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3
复制
发表时间:
2023-04-06
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Bustos, Tatiana E. E.
Bustos, Tatiana E. E.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bunger, Alicia C. C.;Yousefi-Nooraie, Reza;Warren, Keith;Cao, Qiuchang;Dadgostar, Porooshat;Bustos, Tatiana E. E.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

社交网络传播知识、影响力和资源。患者、专业人员和组织之间的这些关系可以影响创新的传播、采用、实施和维持方式。网络改变干预措施——改变或重新连接社交网络的干预措施——有可能被用作实施策略。然而,这些干预措施的类型、机制和实施效果尚不清楚。这种范围审查和迭代综合确定并描述了可以测试实施的网络变更策略。我们对网络干预方面有影响力的文章进行前向和后向引用跟踪、文献计量搜索以及同行评审的社交网络期刊的手动搜索。至少两名团队成员筛选文章标题/摘要,以确定符合纳入标准的研究:干预的实证研究,干预旨在改变社交网络的某些元素,并在两个或多个时间点测量社交网络指标的变化。在全文审查期间,提取了有关网络干预、参与者、联系和主要发现的信息。报告是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 提供的。为了开发我们的类型学,我们使用基于团队的迭代和共识建立过程综合了这些结果。五十三篇文章符合纳入标准。所描述的干预措施是在医疗保健系统或行为健康系统(34%)、社区(26.4%)和学校(22.6%)中进行的。大多数记录描述了旨在改变个体行为者(84.9%)之间的社会支持、信息共享或友谊网络(65%)或增加联系的干预措施。出现了八种策略。针对一般背景的三种策略:(1)改变环境,(2)创建群体,以及(3)改变组成。针对个人参与者的四种策略:改变(4)动机,(5)网络技能,(6)对社交网络的了解,以及(7)知名度/角色。一种策略 (8) 针对网络内的特定关系(针对特定的配对关系或改变现有关系的性质)。这种类型中的网络改变策略为实施策略如何针对关系提供了进一步的操作特异性。推进这些战略将需要更多的理论规范、针对专业人士和组织的战略的制定以及检查对实施结果的影响的研究。在线版本包含可在 10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3 获取的补充材料。
Social networks transmit knowledge, influence, and resources. These relationships among patients, professionals, and organizations can shape how innovations are disseminated, adopted, implemented, and sustained. Network alteration interventions—interventions that change or rewire social networks—have the potential to be used as implementation strategies. Yet, the types, mechanisms, and effectiveness of these interventions for implementation are unclear. This scoping review and iterative synthesis identified and described network alteration strategies that could be tested for implementation. We used forward and backward citation tracking of influential articles on network interventions, bibliometric searches, and hand searches of peer-reviewed social network journals. At least two team members screened article titles/abstracts to identify studies that met inclusion criteria: empirical studies of an intervention, the intervention was designed to alter some element of a social network, and changes in social network metrics were measured at two or more time points. During full-text reviews, information about the network interventions, actors, ties, and main findings was extracted. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). To develop our typology, we synthesized these results using an iterative team-based and consensus-building process. Fifty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. The interventions described were conducted in healthcare systems or behavioral health systems (34%), communities (26.4%), and schools (22.6%). The majority included records describing interventions designed to alter social support, information-sharing, or friendship networks (65%) among individual actors (84.9%), or to increase ties. Eight strategies emerged. Three strategies targeted the general context: (1) change the environment, (2) create groups, and (3) change the composition. Four strategies targeted individual actors: change (4) motivations, (5) skills for networking, (6) knowledge of one’s social network, and (7) prominence/roles. One strategy (8) targeted specific ties within the network (targeting a particular pair-wise relationship or changing the nature of an existing tie). The network alteration strategies in this typology provide further operational specificity for how implementation strategies target relationships. Advancing these strategies will require greater theoretical specification, the development of strategies that target professionals and organizations, and studies that examine the impact on implementation outcomes. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3.
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104
发表时间: 2018-02-01
期刊: HEALTH AFFAIRS
影响因子: 9.7
作者:
Dearing, James W.;Cox, Jeffrey G.
通讯作者: Cox, Jeffrey G.
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
发表时间: 2012-03-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Ahuja, Gautam;Soda, Giuseppe;Zaheer, Akbar
通讯作者: Zaheer, Akbar
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05145-1
发表时间: 2020-05-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Albers, Bianca;Metz, Allison;Burke, Katie
通讯作者: Burke, Katie
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.10.006
发表时间: 2017-10-01
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Aalbers, Rick;Dolfsma, Wilfred
通讯作者: Dolfsma, Wilfred
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01096-1
发表时间: 2020-11-17
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Bunger, Alicia C.;Navarro, Elena I.;Lewis, Cara C.
通讯作者: Lewis, Cara C.