Online survey of university students' perception, awareness and adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures.

Online survey of university students' perception, awareness and adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12889-022-13356-w
复制
发表时间:
2022-05-13
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Wells, Ellen M.
Wells, Ellen M.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Akhter, Salma;Robbins, Meredith;Curtis, Perry;Hinshaw, Belle;Wells, Ellen M.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

确定与新冠肺炎防护措施相关的因素对于提高公共卫生应对能力非常重要。本研究描述了大学生对高校新冠肺炎防范措施的相关意见。2020年秋季,643名美国大学生完成了一项关于对新冠肺炎预防措施的感知、知晓和遵守的在线调查。结果包括协议有效性(自我或他人)、协议遵从性(自我或他人)、违反协议的后果、对违规行为的了解以及对新冠肺炎的关注程度。多元线性回归模型确定了结果变量的相关性。协变量包括性别、种族、居住地、学习领域、班级和对新冠肺炎检测呈阳性的人的了解。总体而言,学生们同意保护性措施(相当于更高的分数)。在调整后的线性模型中,女性(相对于男性)在协议有效性(SELF)(p < 0.001)、违反协议的后果(p = 0.005)和对新冠肺炎的担忧(p < 0.001)上的得分显著高于男性。亚太地区岛民(与白人相比)在协议有效性(SELF)(p < 0.001)、违反协议的后果(p = 0.008)和对新冠肺炎的担忧(p = 0.001)上的得分显著高于白人。研究生(P < 0.001)的礼仪有效性(SELF)、礼仪遵守(SELF)(P = 0.004)和新冠肺炎担忧(P < 0.001)得分高于大一新生。相比之下,新冠肺炎测试阳性的参与者在协议有效性(SELF)(p = 0.02)、协议遵从性(SELF)(p = 0.004)和违反协议的后果(p = 0.008)方面的得分显著较低。总体而言,女性、亚太岛民和研究生更有可能同意或坚持新冠肺炎预防指南,但那些新冠肺炎检测呈阳性的人不太可能这么做。这些结果可能会为今后的预防工作提供参考。网上版载有补充材料,可在10.1186/s12889-022-13356-w查阅。
Determining factors correlated with protective measures against COVID-19 is important to improve public health response. This study describes student opinions related to university COVID-19 preventive measures. In fall 2020, 643 US university students completed an online survey on perception, awareness, and adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures. Outcomes included protocol effectiveness (self or others), protocol adherence (self or others), consequences of protocol violation, knowledge of violations, and level of concern for COVID-19. Multiple linear regression models determined correlates of outcome variables. Covariates included gender, race, residence, area of study, class, and knowledge of someone with a positive COVID-19 test. Overall, students agreed with protective measures (equivalent to higher scores). In adjusted linear models, females (versus males) had significantly higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.005), and concern about COVID-19 (p < 0.001). Asian/Pacific Islander (versus white) had significantly higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.008), and concern about COVID-19 (p = 0.001). Graduate students (versus freshman) had higher scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p < 0.001), protocol adherence (self) (p = 0.004) and concern about COVID-19 (p < 0.001). In contrast, participants who had a positive COVID-19 test had significantly lower scores for protocol effectiveness (self) (p = 0.02), protocol adherence (self) (p = 0.004), and consequences of protocol violation (p = 0.008). Overall, females, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and graduate students were more likely to agree with or adhere to COVID-19 prevention guidelines but those who tested positive for COVID-19 were less likely to do so. These results may inform future prevention efforts. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13356-w.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.002
发表时间: 2010-06
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Lau JT;Griffiths S;Choi KC;Lin C
通讯作者: Lin C
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7006e1
发表时间: 2021-02-12
期刊: MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report
影响因子: --
作者:
Barrios LC;Riggs MA;Green RF;Czarnik M;Nett RJ;Staples JE;Welton MD;Muilenburg JL;Zullig KJ;Gibson-Young L;Perkins AV;Prins C;Lauzardo M;Shapiro J;Asimellis G;Kilgore-Bowling G;Ortiz-Jurado K;Gutilla MJ
通讯作者: Gutilla MJ
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268818000602
发表时间: 2018-04-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Kirolos, A.;Waugh, C.;Stevenson, J.
通讯作者: Stevenson, J.
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70389-6
发表时间: 1999-02-01
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Evanoff, B;Kim, L;Fraser, V
通讯作者: Fraser, V
DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s319331
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Jia Y;Ma S;Bai L;Xiao Q;Wu Y;Gao Y;Han Y;Xie Z;Tang X;Ge J
通讯作者: Ge J