Reclaiming the political: Emancipation and critique in security studies
Reclaiming the political: Emancipation and critique in security studies
复制标题
夺回政治：安全研究中的解放与批判
DOI：
10.1177/0967010612450747
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
João Nunes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
João Nunes
关键的安全研究文献的特点是对安全政治化的共同承诺-即对其假设，影响和（重新）产生的实践的分析。然而，近年来，政治化伴随着一种倾向，即把安全设想为与排斥、全盘化甚至暴力的逻辑联系在一起。这导致了一种不平衡的政治化，削弱了批评。为了解决这一问题，本文探讨了对安全提出解放版本的贡献。从所谓的阿伯里斯特威斯安全研究学院（Aberystwyth School of security studies）开始，但在此基础上，该论点通过对现实和权力概念的系统参与，重新考虑了安全作为解放的意义。这一修订版的安全作为解放，通过解决在安全批判文献中被低估的政治维度，加强了批判。
The critical security studies literature has been marked by a shared commitment towards the politicization of security – that is, the analysis of its assumptions, implications and the practices through which it is (re)produced. In recent years, however, politicization has been accompanied by a tendency to conceive security as connected with a logic of exclusion, totalization and even violence. This has resulted in an imbalanced politicization that weakens critique. Seeking to tackle this situation, the present article engages with contributions that have advanced emancipatory versions of security. Starting with, but going beyond, the so-called Aberystwyth School of security studies, the argument reconsiders the meaning of security as emancipation by making the case for a systematic engagement with the notions of reality and power. This revised version of security as emancipation strengthens critique by addressing political dimensions that have been underplayed in the critical security literature.
安全与环境：证券化理论与美国环境安全政策
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Floyd
通讯作者：
Floyd