The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones
The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones
复制标题
纽约创意区的生命周期：对无规划文化区的意外后果的思考
DOI：
10.1016/j.ccs.2011.06.003
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Braslow
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sharon Zukin;L. Braslow
从20世纪初的格林威治村到今天的布什威克，纽约创意区的历史表明，艺术家工作和生活的非规划或自然发生的地区的意外后果是更高的房价、更密集的资本投资，以及最终的流离失所和士绅化。尽管坚韧不拔和超脱的主题占主导地位，但创意区“不同”的审美表现吸引了非创造性的文化消费者，他们养成了对正宗的波西米亚生活方式的品味。文化企业家，其中一些人本身就是创意制作人，使有知识的消费者进入创意区，最终媒体、更多的消费者和房地产开发商紧随其后。现有的对艺术家住房的微不足道的国家监管并不能达到所宣称的目标，因为建立一个地区“创造性”的声誉会导致群体向外迁移到其他地方。
The history of New York’s creative districts from Greenwich Village in the early 1900s to Bushwick today shows that the unanticipated consequences of unplanned or naturally occurring areas where artists work and live are higher housing prices, more intensive capital investment, and eventual displacement and gentrification. Despite predominant motifs of grittiness and transgression, the esthetic representation of “difference” in creative districts attracts non-creative cultural consumers who develop a taste for an authentic, bohemian lifestyle. Cultural entrepreneurs, some of whom are creative producers themselves, enable knowledgeable consumers’ entry into the creative district, followed eventually by the media, more consumers, and real estate developers. The little state regulation of artists’ housing that exists does not serve the stated goal, for the building of a district’s reputation as “creative” results in group out-migration to other places.