Selection-based note-taking applications

Selection-based note-taking applications
复制标题

基于选择的笔记应用程序

DOI:
10.1145/1240624.1240773
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Koedinger
K. Koedinger
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Bauer;K. Koedinger

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

教育和技术的日益融合导致了一系列笔记应用程序的发展。我们项目的目标是通过评估不同笔记功能的行为和学习结果,为指导此类笔记应用程序的设计提供经验数据。这里报告的研究比较了使用文本编辑器和四种交互技术记笔记。两种标准技术是打字和复制粘贴。这两种新技术分别是限制复制粘贴和菜单选择,旨在提高注意力和处理能力。没有观察到从新技术中获得的假设学习收益。在实施过程中,这些技术效率较低,使用起来似乎更令人沮丧。然而,关于笔记效率和学习的差异的数据表明,基于选择的笔记应用程序(如粘贴和突出显示)有几个重要的含义。我们的研究结果还表明,学生对他们的笔记实践有强烈的意见,这可能会使潜在的有益干预复杂化。
The increasing integration of education and technology has led to the development of a range of note-taking applications. Our project's goal is to provide empirical data to guide the design of such note-taking applications by evaluating the behavioral and learning outcomes of different note-taking functionality. The study reported here compares note-taking using a text editor and four interaction techniques. The two standard techniques are typing and copy-paste. The two novel techniques are restricted copy-paste and menu-selection, intended to increase attention and processing respectively. Hypothesized learning gains from the novel techniques were not observed. As implemented these techniques were less efficient and appeared to be more frustrating to use. However, data regarding differences in both note-taking efficiency and learning suggest several important implications for selection-based note-taking applications, such as pasting and highlighting. Our results also indicate that students have strong opinions regarding their note-taking practices, which may complicate potentially beneficial interventions.