Conservation conflicts: Behavioural threats, frames, and intervention recommendations
Conservation conflicts: Behavioural threats, frames, and intervention recommendations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.012
复制
发表时间：
2018-06-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Keane, Aidan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baynham-Herd, Zachary;Redpath, Steve;Keane, Aidan
保护冲突十分普遍，对生物多样性、生计和人类福祉造成损害。冲突管理往往是通过针对人的行为的干预来进行的。保护干预被认为是更有效的，如果支持的证据和理论的变化-一个逻辑的论点，概述了实现目标所需的步骤。然而，对于保护冲突，支持不同类型的干预措施的证据和逻辑很少受到关注。使用冲突相关的关键词，我们审查了全球冲突环境中行为干预建议的趋势，如同行评议文献中所发表的。我们开发了冲突行为，干预建议和冲突框架的类型学，并确定了它们之间的关联和其他地理变量使用皮尔逊卡方检验的独立性。通过分析最近发表的100篇文章，我们发现技术干预（38%的文章推荐）与涉及野生动物控制和人类-野生动物冲突框架的冲突显著相关。基于执法的干预措施（54%的文章）与非法使用资源的冲突显着相关，而基于知识产权的干预措施（37%的文章）与人与人的冲突框架和高度发达国家相关。只有10%的文章从已发表的科学文献中提供了“强有力”的证据来证明建议的合理性，只有15%的文章概述了变革理论。我们认为，干预建议可能会受到作者对冲突社会基础的看法的影响，也可能受到学科孤岛的影响。
Conservation conflicts are widespread and are damaging for biodiversity, livelihoods and human well-being. Conflict management often occurs through interventions targeting human behaviour. Conservation interventions are thought to be made more effective if underpinned by evidence and a Theory of Change-a logical argument outlining the steps required to achieve goals. However, for conservation conflicts, the evidence and logic supporting different types of interventions has received little attention. Using conflict-related keywords, we reviewed trends in behavioural intervention recommendations across conflict contexts globally, as published in peer-reviewed literature. We developed typologies for conflict behaviours, intervention recommendations, and conflict frames and identified associations between them and other geographical variables using Pearson's Chi-squared tests of independence. Analysing 100 recent articles, we found that technical interventions (recommended in 38% of articles) are significantly associated with conflicts involving wildlife control and the human-wildlife conflict frame. Enforcement-based interventions (54% of articles) are significantly associated with conflicts over illegal resource use, while stakeholder-based interventions (37% of articles) are associated with the human-human conflict frame and very highly developed countries. Only 10% of articles offered "strong" evidence from the published scientific literature justifying recommendations, and only 15% outlined Theories of Change. We suggest that intervention recommendations are likely influenced by authors' perceptions of the social basis of conflicts, and possibly also by disciplinary silos.