Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence.
Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/jsp2.1138
复制
发表时间：
2021-03
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
O'Connell GD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Costi JJ;Ledet EH;O'Connell GD
脊柱生物力学测试方法在过去 50 年来不断发展。在那段时间里，技术方面发生了几次范式转变。这些技术是通过结合最先进的工程原理、体内测量、解剖结构-功能关系和科学方法而发展起来的。多项参数研究重点关注实验技术对结果的影响。因此，测试方法不断发展，但没有标准的测试方案，这使得比较实验之间的结果变得困难，并且关于体内性能的结论也具有挑战性。 2019年，对国际脊柱研究界进行了调查，以确定脊柱生物力学测试的共识以及共识意见是否与科学证据一致。共收到 80 多份调查回复。这项调查的结果证实，虽然一些方法已被普遍采用，但并非所有方法都符合科学证据。这篇综述总结了科学文献、当前共识以及作者根据现有证据汇编提出的最佳实践建议。
Biomechanical testing methodologies for the spine have developed over the past 50 years. During that time, there have been several paradigm shifts with respect to techniques. These techniques evolved by incorporating state‐of‐the‐art engineering principles, in vivo measurements, anatomical structure‐function relationships, and the scientific method. Multiple parametric studies have focused on the effects that the experimental technique has on outcomes. As a result, testing methodologies have evolved, but there are no standard testing protocols, which makes the comparison of findings between experiments difficult and conclusions about in vivo performance challenging. In 2019, the international spine research community was surveyed to determine the consensus on spine biomechanical testing and if the consensus opinion was consistent with the scientific evidence. More than 80 responses to the survey were received. The findings of this survey confirmed that while some methods have been commonly adopted, not all are consistent with the scientific evidence. This review summarizes the scientific literature, the current consensus, and the authors' recommendations on best practices based on the compendium of available evidence.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1115/1.4029698
发表时间：
2015-05-01
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Amin, Dhara B.;Lawless, Isaac M.;Costi, John J.
通讯作者：
Costi, John J.
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Bell KM;Hartman RA;Gilbertson LG;Kang JD
通讯作者：
Kang JD
影响因子：
3
作者：
ADAMS, MA;HUTTON, WC
通讯作者：
HUTTON, WC
DOI：
10.1115/1.4031416
发表时间：
2015-10-01
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Bezci, Semih E.;Nandy, Aditya;O'Connell, Grace D.
通讯作者：
O'Connell, Grace D.
影响因子：
3
作者：
Amin, Dhara B.;Tavakoli, Javad;Costi, John J.
通讯作者：
Costi, John J.