The remember response:: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection
The remember response:: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03196778
复制
发表时间：
2005-10-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Wong, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rotello, CM;Macmillan, NA;Wong, M
长期以来，再认记忆判断一直被认为依赖于两个潜在的过程：回忆和熟悉。我们用受试者操作特征(ROC)数据和记忆知晓判断来测量回忆。在标准的记住-知道指令下，对回忆的两种估计是不同的。当受试者被告知他们可能需要向实验者证明他们的记忆反应是正确的时，两种估计更有可能是一致的。这些数据支持这样的结论，即记忆反应通常基于一个连续的潜在过程，但特定的任务指令可以产生似乎与高阈值回忆过程一致的数据。基于信号检测理论的模型比双过程模型(Yonelinas，1994)或纯过程解释更好地解释了这些数据。
Recognition memory judgments have long been assumed to depend on the contributions of two underlying processes: recollection and familiarity. We measured recollection with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) data and remember-know judgments. Under standard remember-know instructions, the two estimates of recollection diverged. When subjects were told they might need to justify their remember responses to the experimenter, the two estimates were more likely to agree. The data support the conclusion that remember responses are generally based on a continuous underlying process but that specific task instructions can produce data that appear consistent with a high-threshold recollective process. Models based on signal detection theory provide a better account of these data than does the dual-process model (Yonelinas, 1994) or process-pure interpretations.