Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence
Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/nur.1017
复制
发表时间：
2001-04-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Kearney, MH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kearney, MH
对应用于护理实践的定性研究结果的评估可以超出证据发展到研究结果本身特征的范围。描述了五类定性发现，其复杂性和发现程度各不相同：受先验框架限制的定性发现、描述性类别、共享路径或意义、经验变化的描述以及密集的解释性描述。提出了定性证据的四种临床应用模式——洞察力或同理心、状态或进展评估、预期指导和辅导——它们的可见性和患者参与程度各不相同。定性研究结果的复杂性和发现性越大，临床应用的潜力就越强。 (C) 2001 约翰威利父子公司
Evaluation of qualitative findings for application to nursing practice can so beyond the riser with which the evidence was developed to the characteristics of the findings themselves. Five categories of qualitative findings are described that vary in their levels of complexity and discovery: those restricted by a priori frameworks, descriptive categories, shared pathway or meaning, depiction of experiential variation, and dense explanatory description. Four modes of clinical application of qualitative evidence are proposed-insight or empathy, assessment of status or progress, anticipatory guidance, and coaching-that vary in their degree of visibility and patient involvement. The greater the complexity and discovery within qualitative findings, the stronger may be the potential for clinical application. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.