Clinical utility of flumazenil-PET versus [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and MRI in refractory partial epilepsy -: A prospective study in 100 patients

Clinical utility of flumazenil-PET versus [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and MRI in refractory partial epilepsy -: A prospective study in 100 patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/brain/121.11.2067
复制
发表时间:
1998-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
14.5
通讯作者:
Mauguiére, F
Mauguiére, F
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ryvlin, P;Bouvard, S;Mauguiére, F

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们在100例接受术前评估的癫痫患者中前瞻性评估了[C-11]氟马西尼-PET(FMZ-PET)的临床效用,并确定了这种神经成像技术相对于MRI和[F-18]氟脱氧葡萄糖-PET(FDG-PET)的具体贡献。所有患者均受益于长期视频EEG监测,而40例患者进行了颅内EEG调查。我们的大多数患者(73%)表现出FMZ-PET异常;颞叶癫痫(94%)的命中率显著高于其他类型的癫痫(50%)(P < 0.001)。大多数FMZ-PET结果与MRI异常(81%)共存,包括海马萎缩(35%)和FDG-PET上的局灶性低代谢(89%),FMZ结合减少的区域通常小于葡萄糖低代谢(48%)或大于MRI异常(28%),FMZ-PET在评估发作区范围方面并不证明上级于FDG-PET,但在以下三种情况下,FMZ-PET可提供与MRT和FDG-PET互补的有用数据:(1)在伴有海马硬化MRI征象的颞叶癫痫中,当FMZ-PET异常与FDG-PET异常同延时,FMZ-PET异常可精确地描绘癫痫发作的部位;(ii)在双颞叶癫痫中,FMZ-PET有助于确认癫痫发作的双侧起源,在33%的病例中显示了双侧颞叶FMZ结合减少的特定模式;(iii)在单侧隐源性额叶癫痫患者中,FMZ-PET在55%的病例中提供了癫痫发作的侧面和部位的进一步证据。因此,FMZ-PET值得纳入这些特定类别癫痫患者的术前评估中,这些患者约占考虑进行癫痫手术的人群的一半。
We assessed the clinical utility of [C-11]flumazenil-PET (FMZ-PET) prospectively in 100 epileptic patients undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation, and defined the specific contribution of this neuro-imaging technique with respect to those of MRI and [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET), All patients benefited from a long term video-EEG monitoring, whereas an intracranial EEG investigation was performed in 40 cases. Most of our patients (73%) demonstrated a FMZ-PET abnormality; this hit rate was significantly higher in temporal lobe epilepsy (94%) than in other types of epilepsy (50%) (P < 0.001). Most FMZ-PET findings coexisted with a MRI abnormality (81%), including hippocampal atrophy (35%) and focal hypometabolism on FDG-PET (89%), The area of decreased FMZ binding was often smaller than that of glucose hypometabolism (48%) or larger than that of the MRI abnormality (28%), FMZ-PET did not prove superior to FDG-PET in assessing the extent of the ictal onset zone, as defined by intracranial EEG recordings, However, it provided useful data which were complementary to those of MRT and FDG-PET in three situations: (i) in temporal lobe epilepsy associated with MRI signs of hippocampal sclerosis, FMZ-PET abnormalities delineated the site of seizure onset precisely, whenever they were coextensive with FDG-PET abnormalities; (ii) in bi-temporal epilepsy, FMZ-PET helped to confirm the bilateral origin of seizures by showing a specific pattern of decreased FMZ binding in both temporal lobes in 33% of cases; (iii) in patients with a unilateral cryptogenic frontal lobe epilepsy, FMZ-PET provided further evidence of the side and site of seizure onset in 55% of cases. Thus, FMZ-PET deserves to be included in the pre-surgical evaluation of these specific categories of epileptic patients, representing approximately half of the population considered for epilepsy surgery.