Digit Symbol Performance and Self-Report of Anxiety
Digit Symbol Performance and Self-Report of Anxiety
复制标题
数字符号表现和焦虑自我报告
DOI：
10.2466/pms.1972.35.2.382
复制
发表时间：
1972
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Ronald E. Walker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anthony C. Firetto;H. Davey;Ronald E. Walker
在之前的研究中，研究人员发现，简单地自我报告 WAIS 期间存在的焦虑会导致数字跨度表现降低 (1, 4)。 Furrcr、Walkcr、Sanniro 和 Firerro (3) 报告了 WAIS 言语 subrerrr 的 nll 的相似 rignificanr rerulrr，comprchcnrian 的例外，使用相同的关于存在焦虑的自我报告。本发明旨在将 sbovc 的发现推广到与 rhc WAIS 的数字符号类似的性能桶中。来自入门心理学课程的男性和女性志愿者（ns = 48）接受了 Mnndler sod Sararoo（1952）的 Tcrt 焦虑问卷（TAQ）。然后，Sr 分别给出一个数字符号 wrk，类似于 ro rhc WAIS，具有 120 iremr 和 2 英里的限制。在时间限制结束时，他们被记录下来，写下他们如何感受 afrcr lhedring rhe inrrruc"ons，这 rravd rhar rherr 战争是一般 inrelligcncc 的一个简短措施。被检查者也没有亲自认识的党员被分为两组：“无焦虑”（N = 4 5）和“无焦虑”（N = 51），根据他们表达的焦虑感（例如，“焦虑”，“担心”。“不关心”。“ocrvour。”rrc。）或无焦虑（例如，“平静”，“”）。 “不关心。”“令人愉快。”在 rlle wrirrco 报告中。对 rclf 报告组的分析显示，“焦虑”和“nao-焦虑”Sr 的 TAQ 分数之间没有显着差异（MA = 108，Msa = 100.3；6 = 1.67，p > .05，nvo-railed [err）。然而，自我报告的分析与上述的研究结论相吻合。与那些不报告焦虑的人相比，报告了焦虑的高级人员的表现显着降低（MA = 61.78，MI = 65.53；I = 1.69，p < 0.05，one.railed rest）。还有rerulers暗示着自我。 RC P R R 节奏学将有助于 King 中的 ndjuncr 和更准确的 lrrsrrrmcnr，不仅是言语任务，而且是 inrelligcncc rcrrr 的表现风险。
In previou studies, investigators have found that s rimple self-report o f the presence of anxiety during WAIS resriog rrlared to lowered digit span performance (1, 4 ) . Furrhcr, WaLkcr, Sanniro, and Firerro ( 3 ) reported rimilar rignificanr rerulrr for nll of the WAIS verbal subrerrr, excepr for comprchcnrian, using the same rimple self-report of rhc presence of anxiety. The present invcsrigarian anempred to generalize the sbovc findings ro a performance cask rimilar ro rhe digit symbol of rhc WAIS. Male and female volunrccrs (ns = 48) from a n inrroducroty psychology class were administered the Tcrt Anxiety Questionnaire (TAQ) of Mnndler sod Sararoo (1952) . Sr were then individually giveo a digit symbol wrk similar ro rhc WAIS having 120 iremr and a 2-mi". rimc limit. At the end of the time limit, rhey were nrked ro write n rhorr dercriprion of how rhey had felt afrcr lhedring rhe inrrruc"ons which rravd rhar rhe rerr war a brlef measure of general inrelligcncc. Ss who were nor perronally known by rhe examincrr were divided into w o groups: "non.anxiou" ( N = 4 5 ) and "anxlou" ( N = 51) oo the barir of their expressed feelings o f anxiety (e.8.. "anxiour," "worried." "unrary." "ocrvour." rrc.) or no aoxiety (e.g., "calm," "unconcerned." "enjoyable." erc.) in rlle wrirrco reporrs. An analysis of the rclf-reporr g r o u p rhowed rhar rhere was no significanr difference between the TAQ scores of thc "anxious" and "nao-anxious" Sr (MA = 108, Msa = 100.3; 6 = 1.67, p > .05, nvo-railed [err). However, rhe self-report analysis war conrirrenr with the prevlaus srudier meotioned above. There war a significant lowering of performance for Sr reportiag aovicty ar compared with those nor reporting anxiety ( M A = 61.78, MI. = 65.53; I = 1.69, p < .05, one.railed rest) . There rerulrs suggest that the self. r c p r r merhodology would be n helpfvl ndjuncr in -king n more accurare lrrsrrrmcnr of not only the verbal tasks bur also rhe performance rasks of inrelligcncc rcrrr.