PUBLIC CRISES, PUBLIC FUTURES

PUBLIC CRISES, PUBLIC FUTURES
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/09502386.2012.730542
复制
发表时间:
2013-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Clarke, John
Clarke, John
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mahony, Nick;Clarke, John

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文开始勾勒一种分析当代公共危机情境、它们之间的关系以及这些场景为政治所提供的可能性的新方法。文章阐述并分析了这类当代场景的一小部分例子,并呼吁更多地关注公共和政治调解的不同形式与实践的条件和后果。通过提出一种三分法类型学来描绘“受动的”、“受众的”和“能动的”公众之间的差异,文章开始阐明政治和公共的未来如何可能被视为与公众被想象具有的潜力、能力和特质以及被赋予资源去执行的方式紧密相关。因此,本文结合当代危机的不同形式以及这些危机所着力表达、凸显以及在想象和实践上支持的政治关切和公众,对公共行动和未来的公众进行了分析。
This article begins to map out a novel approach to analysing contemporary contexts of public crisis, relationships between them and possibilities that these scenes hold out for politics. The article illustrates and analyses a small selection of examples of these kinds of contemporary scenes and calls for greater attention to be given to the conditions and consequences of different forms and practices of public and political mediation. In offering a three-fold typology to delineate differences between abject', audience' and agentic' publics the article begins to draw out how political and public futures may be seen as being bound up with how the potentialities, capacities and qualities that publics are imagined to have and resourced to perform. Public action and future publics are therefore analysed here in relation to different versions of contemporary crisis and the political concerns and publics these crises work to articulate, foreground and imaginatively and practically support.