Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.488
复制
发表时间:
1990-10
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
G. C. Orden;Bruce F. Pennington;Gregory O. Stone
G. C. Orden;Bruce F. Pennington;Gregory O. Stone
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. C. Orden;Bruce F. Pennington;Gregory O. Stone

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

有关印刷文字识别的大量文献要么与双过程理论(最广泛接受的印刷文字识别理论)的每个中心假设相矛盾,要么提供含糊不清的支持。相比之下,另一种亚符号方法得到了明确、积极的支持,其中包括语音编码过程的核心作用。该子符号帐户是围绕协变学习假设开发的,该假设源自子符号范式中当前学习算法所共有的设计原则。在这一假设适用的地方,而且它可能广泛适用,它预测了一个共同的经验发展概况。
The vast literature concerning printed word identification either contradicts or provides ambiguous support for each of the central hypotheses of dual-process theory, the most widely accepted theory of printed word identification. In contrast, clear, positive support exists for an alternative subsymbolic approach that includes a central role for the process of phonologic coding. This subsymbolic account is developed around a covariant learning hypothesis, derived from a design principle common to current learning algorithms within the subsymbolic paradigm. Where this hypothesis applies, and it may apply broadly, it predicts a common empirical profile of development.