ELABORATION, ORGANIZATION, AND THE SELF-REFERENCE EFFECT IN MEMORY

ELABORATION, ORGANIZATION, AND THE SELF-REFERENCE EFFECT IN MEMORY
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26
复制
发表时间:
1986-03-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
KIHLSTROM, JF
KIHLSTROM, JF
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
KLEIN, SB;KIHLSTROM, JF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对272名大学生进行了5项实验,这些实验对自我参照效应的解释提出了挑战,自我参照效应提出了比语义编码产生更精细的记忆痕迹,证明了自我参照和语义编码产生几乎相同的自由回忆水平,如果它们首先等同于它们鼓励的组织量。实验一试图复制结核病罗杰斯等人的研究结果(见记录1979-25246-001),通过比较自我指涉,语义和结构编码任务,并检查这些编码任务之间的集群差异在自由回忆。随后的实验正交变化的组织和编码任务。总体结果导致以下结论:组织,而不是精心制作,是负责上级的回忆性能时获得的信息是自我参考编码。组织不是自我指涉编码的必要组成部分,并且可以在自我指涉和语义编码任务中正交变化。如何组织的基础上的单因素理论可以解释许多文献中报道的自我指涉回忆的结果进行了讨论。(92参考)(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
Conducted 5 experiments with 272 undergraduates that challenged the interpretation of the self-reference effect that proposes that self-reference produces a more elaborate memory trace than semantic encoding by demonstrating that self-referent and semantic encodings produce virtually identical free recall levels if they are first equated for the amount of organization they encourage. Exp I attempted to replicate the findings of TB Rogers et al (see record 1979-25246-001) by comparing self-referent, semantic, and structural encoding tasks and examining cluster differences between these encoding tasks during free recall. The experiments that followed orthogonally varied organization and the encoding task. Overall results lead to the following conclusions: Organization, not elaboration, is responsible for the superior recall performance obtained when information is encoded self-referentially. Organization is not a necessary component of self-referent encoding and can be orthogonally varied within self-referent and semantic encoding tasks. How a single-factor theory based on organization can account for many of the self-referent recall findings reported in the literature is discussed.(92 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)