Modernity in Question?: Culture and Religion in an Age of Global Modernity
Modernity in Question?: Culture and Religion in an Age of Global Modernity
复制标题
现代性受到质疑?:全球现代性时代的文化与宗教
DOI:
10.1353/dsp.2011.0040
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Dirlik
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Dirlik
I would like to present an analytical framework that seeks to make sense of two seemingly contradictory developments over the last two decades: economic and political globalization that is taken generally to point to unprecedented global integration, and the resurgence of religions or, more broadly, traditionalisms, that create new political and cultural fractures, or reopen old ones. Most discussions of global developments privilege one or the other of these phenomena. We are all familiar with the by now prolific literature on globalization offering visions (or threats) of impending global integration and homogenization, in which the divisiveness introduced by religious revivals appears merely as a legacy of the past, one that is likely to be bridged by an irresistible globalization that reshapes the world. On the other side are analyses in which religious revivals are everything, not as remnants of the past but as products of modernity that point to multiple modernities or "clashes of civilizations" as the human fate for the foreseeable future. Emphasis on one or the other precludes recognition that integration and fragmentation—or homogenization and heterogenization—may be contradictory aspects of the same processes that are restructuring the globe. I have descrihed this emerging global condition as "global modernity." As I shall explain below at greater length, I understand by this term not just global political and cultural relationships but also social relationships that cut across national and civilizational divides. The question of religion or religious fundamentalism is not a 'Third World" or Islamic question. It is, more importantly, a question of capitalist modernity. The resurgence of religion in recent decades is not just a phenomenon in developing societies whose cultural legacies are bound to the past, if mostly in appearance, hut a product of capitalist modernity that is also very much alive in the society that claims to be the most advanced in the world—or, at any rate, the most powerful—where it is entangled in the most unabashed neoliberal faith in the primacy of the market and individual enterprise. The coUectivist forms it takes in other social contexts—not just in Islamic but also in so-called Confucian societies—also points
DOI:
--
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--