SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies.
SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41586-020-2852-1
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
影响因子:
64.8
通讯作者:
Bjorkman PJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barnes CO;Jette CA;Abernathy ME;Dam KA;Esswein SR;Gristick HB;Malyutin AG;Sharaf NG;Huey-Tubman KE;Lee YE;Robbiani DF;Nussenzweig MC;West AP Jr;Bjorkman PJ
The COVID-19 pandemic presents an urgent health crisis. Human neutralizing antibodies (hNAbs) that target the host ACE2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike show therapeutic promise and are being evaluated clincally. To determine structural correlates of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, we solved 8 new structures of distinct COVID-19 hNAbs in complex with SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer or RBD. Structural comparisons allowed classification into categories: (1) VH3-53 hNAbs with short CDRH3s that block ACE2 and bind only to “up” RBDs, (2) ACE2-blocking hNAbs that bind both “up” and “down” RBDs and can contact adjacent RBDs, (3) hNAbs that bind outside the ACE2 site and recognize “up” and “down” RBDs, and (4) Previously-described antibodies that do not block ACE2 and bind only “up” RBDs. Class 2 comprised four hNAbs whose epitopes bridged RBDs, including a VH3-53 hNAb that used a long CDRH3 with a hydrophobic tip to bridge between adjacent “down” RBDs, thereby locking spike into a closed conformation. Epitope/paratope mapping revealed few interactions with host-derived N-glycans and minor contributions of antibody somatic hypermutations to epitope contacts. Affinity measurements and mapping of naturally-occurring and in vitro-selected spike mutants in 3D provided insight into the potential for SARS-CoV-2 escape from antibodies elicited during infection or delivered therapeutically. These classifications and structural analyses provide rules for assigning current and future human RBD-targeting antibodies into classes, evaluating avidity effects, suggesting combinations for clinical use, and providing insight into immune responses against SARS-CoV-2.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1107/s0907444910051218
发表时间:
2011-04
期刊:
Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bunkóczi G;Read RJ
通讯作者:
Read RJ
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Hsieh, Ching-Lin;Goldsmith, Jory A.;McLellan, Jason S.
通讯作者:
McLellan, Jason S.
DOI:
10.1107/s0907444909052925
发表时间:
2010-02
期刊:
Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography
影响因子:
--
作者:
Adams PD;Afonine PV;Bunkóczi G;Chen VB;Davis IW;Echols N;Headd JJ;Hung LW;Kapral GJ;Grosse-Kunstleve RW;McCoy AJ;Moriarty NW;Oeffner R;Read RJ;Richardson DC;Richardson JS;Terwilliger TC;Zwart PH
通讯作者:
Zwart PH
DOI:
10.1107/s0907444909042073
发表时间:
2010-01
期刊:
Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chen VB;Arendall WB 3rd;Headd JJ;Keedy DA;Immormino RM;Kapral GJ;Murray LW;Richardson JS;Richardson DC
通讯作者:
Richardson DC
DOI:
10.1107/s2059798320003198
发表时间:
2020-04-01
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Beilsten-Edmands, James;Winter, Graeme;Evans, Gwyndaf
通讯作者:
Evans, Gwyndaf