A survey of clarithromycin monotherapy and long-term administration of ethambutol for patients with MAC lung disease in Japan: A retrospective cohort study using the database of health insurance claims
A survey of clarithromycin monotherapy and long-term administration of ethambutol for patients with MAC lung disease in Japan: A retrospective cohort study using the database of health insurance claims
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/pds.4951
复制
发表时间:
2019-12-25
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Kuroda, Tomohiro
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Iwao, Tomohide;Kato, Genta;Kuroda, Tomohiro
Background The number of patients with nontuberculous mycobacteriosis (NTM) has increased exponentially in recent years. In Japan, approximately 88.8% of patients with NTM suffer from Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) lung disease. Incidence of MAC lung disease is increasing in particularly among the middle-aged and elderly women owing to a rapid increase in nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. General treatment for MAC lung disease is chemotherapy. The type of chemotherapy recommended by specialists to prevent the development of a drug-resistant strain of the bacteria consists of a combination of clarithromycin (CAM), rifampicin, and ethambutol (EB). CAM monotherapy is contraindicated by specialists owing to its high potential to induce drug-resistant bacterial strains in patients with MAC lung disease. In addition, administering EB at doses not less than 1000 mg d(-1) is not recommended to avoid adverse drug reactions. However, it is unclear how much such treatment cases exist in real world clinical settings. This is because no long-term investigation has been carried out. Materials and Methods This study investigated treatment with these drugs from 2005 to 2017, by studying 1135 patients with MAC lung disease based on health insurance claims database. Results Results showed that approximately 9.2% (101 cases) were prescribed long-term CAM monotherapy for 3 months or longer and approximately 3.6% (18 cases) were prescribed high doses of EB. Conclusion CAM monotherapy over a long period of time is potentially detrimental to some patients. Better awareness of the types of treatments and their potential negative effects will be beneficial to clinical practitioners.