Diagnostic and clinical relevance of the number of circulating CD34+ cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia

Diagnostic and clinical relevance of the number of circulating CD34+ cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia
复制标题

DOI:
10.1182/blood.v98.12.3249
复制
发表时间:
2001-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
20.3
通讯作者:
Frassoni, F
Frassoni, F
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barosi, G;Viarengo, G;Frassoni, F

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对84例骨髓纤维化伴髓样化生(MMM)和23例其他Ph阴性慢性骨髓增生性疾病(CMD)患者外周血CD 34(+)细胞绝对含量进行了检测。在MMM中,循环CD 34(+)细胞的中位绝对数量始终较高(91.6 x 10(6)/L;范围,0-2460 x 10(6)/L)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,以CD 34(+)细胞15 × 10(6)/L作为判定标准,几乎可以完全区分未接受治疗的MMM患者和其他Ph-CMD患者(阳性预测值,98.4%;阴性预测值,85.0%)。CD 34+细胞数量较高的MMM患者的病程明显较长(P = .019),脾脏体积指数(P = .014)、肝脏体积(P = .000)、循环未成熟髓系细胞百分比(P = .020)和髓系原始细胞百分比(P = .000)较高。当CD 34(+)细胞与使用Dupriez危险分层相关时,CD 34(+)细胞从低风险(中位数,68.1 × 10(6)/L)显著增加到中风险(中位数,112.8 × 10(6)/L)和高风险患者(中位数666.1 × 10(6)/L)(F = 4.95; P = 0.009)。当CD 34(+)细胞与基于骨髓增生和骨髓耗竭特征的疾病严重程度评分相关时,只有骨髓增生指数与CD 34(+)细胞水平显著相关(F = 5.7; P = .000)。CD 34(+)细胞超过300 × 10(6)/L的患者的总生存期和从CD 34(+)细胞分析开始的母细胞转化间隔显著较短(分别为P = 0.005和0.0005)。总之,CD 34(+)循环细胞的绝对数量使MINIM与其他Ph-CMD区分开来;它与骨髓增殖的程度密切相关,并预测向母细胞转化的演变。(血。2001;98:3249-3255)(C)2001由美国血液学学会。
The absolute content of CD34(+) cells in the peripheral blood of 84 patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) and 23 patients with other Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMDs) was investigated. In MMM, the median absolute number of circulating CD34(+) cells was consistently high (91.6 x 10(6)/L; range, 0-2460 x 10(6)/L). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 15 x 10(6)/L as a decision criterion for CD34(+) cells produced an almost complete discrimination between MMM patients out of therapy and other Ph- CMDs (positive predictive value, 98.4%; negative predictive value, 85.0%). MMM patients with higher numbers of CD34+ cells had a significantly longer disease duration (P = .019) and higher spleen volume index (P = .014), liver volume (P = .000), percentage of circulating immature myeloid cells (P = .020), and percentage of myeloid blasts (P = .000). When CD34(+) cells were correlated with the use of Dupriez risk stratification, CD34(+) cells increased significantly from low-risk (median, 68.1 x 10(6)/L) to intermediate-risk (median, 112.8 x 10(6)/L) and high-risk patients (median 666.1 x 10(6)/L) (F = 4.95; P = .009). When CD34(+) cells were correlated with a severity score on the basis of both myeloproliferative and myelodepletive characteristics of the disease, only the myeloproliferation index was significantly associated with CD34(+) cell level (F = 5.7; P = .000). Overall survival and interval to blast transformation from the time of CD34(+) cell analysis were significantly shorter in patients with more than 300 x 10(6)/L CD34(+) cells (P = .005 and .0005, respectively). In conclusion, the absolute number of CD34(+) circulating cells allows MINIM to be distinguished from other Ph- CMDs; it is strongly associated with the extent of myeloproliferation and predicts evolution toward blast transformation. (Blood. 2001;98:3249-3255) (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.