Geothermal district heating institutional factors: the Klamath Falls experience
Geothermal district heating institutional factors: the Klamath Falls experience
复制标题
地热区域供暖制度因素：克拉马斯福尔斯的经验
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Lienau
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Lienau
1984年3月20日，克拉马斯市福尔斯的吉姆斯区域供热系统开始为10座政府大楼供热。这一开始是在该系统完成后两年半。建设和这项业务计划只有四个月的测试期。延迟是由于市民反对从地热水库抽水和向地热水库注入流体，并通过选民通过的城市法令依法执行。该倡议条例基本上通过要求从地热井泵出的任何水返回到同一口井来管理资源的生产。俄勒冈州对该市提起诉讼，声称该州没有被先发制人，该法令是有效和可执行的。历史的发展，导致了这些制度和法律的问题的描述进行了讨论。介绍了通过水库工程研究和公众会议提出的公民反对意见和第三方缓解措施。从克拉马斯福尔斯的经验教训指出，以便在其他社区的未来发展可能受益。
The city of Klamath Falls Geothermal District Heating System began providing heat to ten government buildings on March 20, 1984. This start is two and one-half years after completion of the system. Construction and this operation is scheduled for only a four month test period. The delay was the result of citizens objecting to pumping from and injecting fluids into the geothermal reservoir and was legally enforced by means of a city ordinance passed by the voters. This Initiative Ordinance essentially regulates production of the resource by requiring any water pumped from a geothermal well be returned to that same well. The state of Oregon filed a law suit against the city, claiming that the state was not pre-empted and the ordinance was valid and enforceable. Historical description of developments that led up to these institutional and legal problems are discussed. Citizens objections and third party mitigation measures by means of reservoir engineering studies and public meetings are described. Lessons learned from the Klamath Falls experience are pointed out so future development in other communities may benefit.