Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age.

Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01717.x
复制
发表时间:
2008-06
期刊:
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Heitmann B
Heitmann B
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adegboye AR;Heitmann B

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了确定母亲回忆儿童出生体重 (BW) 和胎龄 (GA) 的准确性,以丹麦医学出生登记 (DBR) 作为参考,并检查回忆的 BW 及其潜在相关性的可靠性。 DBR 和欧洲青年心脏研究 (EYHS) 的数据比较。丹麦欧登塞的学校。共有 1271 名学童母亲和 678 名学童母亲分别参与了 BW 和 GA 准确性研究的信息。 BW 的可靠性样本由 359 名女性组成。两个来源之间的一致性通过平均差(MD)、组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼图来评估。还估计了各种 BW 和 GA 类别的错误分类。召回和注册的 BW 和 GA 之间的差异。召回和注册的 BW(MD =−0.2 g;ICC = 0.94)和 GA(MD = 0.3 周;ICC = 0.76)之间高度一致。根据母亲的回忆,只有 1.6% 的 BW 会被错误分类为低、正常或高 BW,16.5% 的 GA 会被错误分类为早产、足月或产后。逻辑回归显示,召回和登记的 BW 之间不一致的最重要变量是种族和奇偶性。母亲对 BW 的回忆高度可靠(MD =−5.5 g;ICC = 0.93),并且各个亚组的可靠性仍然很高。母亲对 BW 和 GA 的回忆似乎对于临床和流行病学用途来说足够准确。请引用本文:Adegboye A,Heitmann B。母亲对出生体重和胎龄的回忆的准确性和相关性。 BJOG 2008;115:886–893。
To determine the accuracy of maternal recall of children birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA), using the Danish Medical Birth Register (DBR) as reference and to examine the reliability of recalled BW and its potential correlates. Comparison of data from the DBR and the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). Schools in Odense, Denmark. A total of 1271 and 678 mothers of school children participated with information in the accuracy studies of BW and GA, respectively. The reliability sample of BW was composed of 359 women. The agreement between the two sources was evaluated by mean differences (MD), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman's plots. The misclassification of the various BW and GA categories were also estimated. Differences between recalled and registered BW and GA. There was high agreement between recalled and registered BW (MD =−0.2 g; ICC = 0.94) and GA (MD = 0.3 weeks; ICC = 0.76). Only 1.6% of BW would have been misclassified into low, normal or high BW and 16.5% of GA would have been misclassified into preterm, term or post-term based on maternal recall. The logistic regression revealed that the most important variables in the discordance between recalled and registered BW were ethnicity and parity. Maternal recall of BW was highly reliable (MD =−5.5 g; ICC = 0.93), and reliability remained high across subgroups. Maternal recall of BW and GA seems to be sufficiently accurate for clinical and epidemiological use. Please cite this paper as: Adegboye A, Heitmann B. Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age. BJOG 2008;115:886–893.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.018
发表时间: 2006-12-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Li, Chung-Yi;Wei, Jung-Nan;Sung, Fung-Chang
通讯作者: Sung, Fung-Chang
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00757.x
发表时间: 2006-11-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Lucia, Victoria C.;Luo, Zhehui;Breslau, Naomi
通讯作者: Breslau, Naomi
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116627
发表时间: 1993-06-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
WACHOLDER, S;ARMSTRONG, B;HARTGE, P
通讯作者: HARTGE, P
DOI: 10.2307/2529310
发表时间: 1977-01-01
期刊: BIOMETRICS
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
LANDIS, JR;KOCH, GG
通讯作者: KOCH, GG
DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1592s
发表时间: 2003-05-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Kramer, MS
通讯作者: Kramer, MS