Evaluating Digital Cultural Heritage 'In the Wild' The Case For Reflexivity
Evaluating Digital Cultural Heritage 'In the Wild' The Case For Reflexivity
复制标题
评估“野外”数字文化遗产的反身性案例
DOI：
10.1145/3287272
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Galani A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Galani A
数字遗产解读往往不受传统博物馆学技术和环境的束缚。随着博物馆和遗产地探索定位技术的潜力以及更复杂的户外内容触发机制，数字遗产研究人员能够探索的问题变得越来越复杂。研究人员现在发现自己处于沉浸式、体验式和表演式的领域。与他们的研究参与者密切合作，他们导航模糊的地形，包括往往不可预测的情感共鸣，是互动的直接后果。本文创建了两个案例研究之间的对话，一起来，有助于解开一些关键的方法和伦理问题，从这些发展。首先，我们介绍了我看到的新眼睛，这是一个巡回和沉浸式的数字遗产遭遇，它打破了物理/数字，事实/虚构和过去/现在之间的界限。第二，我们详细介绍了移动的手机上的岩石艺术，这是一套对话式的网络应用程序，旨在探索移动的设备在乡村户外提供遗产解释的潜力。从这些案例研究中向外看，我们反思了传统的评估框架是如何被拉伸和拉紧的，因为数字遗产研究人员正在探索的问题。从经验为导向的定性研究与参与者借鉴的小插曲，我们阐述了具体的共同评估的挑战，具体的，多模态的，和transmedial的性质正在调查的数字遗产的经验。在这样做的时候，我们使反身性的情况下，作为一个中心和更多的合作功能的研究设计在这一领域的前进-关注和倡导研究人员和我们研究的遗产经验之间的相互关系。
Digital heritage interpretation is often untethered from traditional museological techniques and environments. As museums and heritage sites explore the potential of locative technologies and ever more sophisticated content-triggering mechanisms for use outdoors, the kinds of questions that digital heritage researchers are able to explore have become increasingly more complex. Researchers now find themselves in the realm of the immersive, the experiential, and the performative. Working closely with their research participants, they navigate ambiguous terrain, including the often unpredictable affective resonances that are the direct consequences of interaction.This article creates a dialogue between two case studies which, taken together, help to unpack some key methodological and ethical questions emerging from these developments. First, we introduceWith New Eyes I See,an itinerant and immersive digital heritage encounter which collapsed boundaries between physical/digital, fact/fiction and past/present. Second, we detailRock Art on Mobile Phones, a set of dialogic web apps that aimed to explore the potential of mobile devices in delivering heritage interpretation in the rural outdoors.Looking outward from these case studies, we reflect on how traditional evaluation frameworks are being stretched and strained given the kinds of questions that digital heritage researchers are now exploring. Drawing on vignettes from experience-oriented qualitative studies with participants, we articulate specific common evaluative challenges related to the embodied, multimodal, and transmedial nature of the digital heritage experiences under investigation. In doing so, we make the case for reflexivity as a central and more collaborative feature of research design within this field going forward — paying attention to and advocating the reciprocal relationship between researchers and the heritage experiences that we study.