The nature of narrative coherence: An empirical approach
The nature of narrative coherence: An empirical approach
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2018.01.001
复制
发表时间：
2018-06-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Seitz, Sophia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adler, Jonathan M.;Waters, Theodore E. A.;Seitz, Sophia
连贯性是个人叙事的基本要素，但叙事连贯性的经验性质仍然难以捉摸。本研究采用归纳实证方法来确定叙事连贯的结构，探索不同既定编码系统的共同和独特贡献。来自158名社区成年人的不同样本的生活故事使用三种常见的编码系统进行编码，以实现叙事连贯性（Baerger & McAdams，1999; Lysaker，Clements，Plascak-Hallberg，Knipscheer，& Wright，2002; Reese等人，2011年）。主成分分析表明，这三个组成部分，标记为时间细节，心理语境，意义/解释。这三个组成部分并不以一对一的方式映射到现有的编码系统上。本研究为叙事连贯的定量研究提出了未来的发展方向。(C)2018爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Coherence represents a foundational element of personal narratives, but the empirical nature of narrative coherence remains elusive. The present study applied an inductive empirical approach to determining the structure of narrative coherence, exploring shared and unique contributions from different established coding systems. Life stories from a diverse sample of 158 community adults were coded using three common coding systems for operationalizing narrative coherence (Baerger & McAdams, 1999; Lysaker, Clements, Plascak-Hallberg, Knipscheer, & Wright, 2002; Reese et al., 2011). Principle components analysis indicated three components, which were labeled Temporal Detail, Psychological Context, and Meaning/Interpretation. The three components do not map onto the existing coding systems in a one-to-one manner. This study suggests future directions for the quantitative study of narrative coherence. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.