Clinical Outcomes of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Guided Strategy
Clinical Outcomes of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Guided Strategy
复制标题
动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像结合冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影引导策略的临床结果。
DOI:
10.1161/circimaging.119.009775
复制
发表时间:
2020-01-01
影响因子:
7.5
通讯作者:
Zhang, Jiayin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yu, Mengmeng;Shen, Chengxing;Zhang, Jiayin
BACKGROUND: Dynamic computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides quantitative myocardial blood flow for the precise assessment of myocardial ischemia. However, compared with coronary CT angiography (CCTA), whether this functional imaging modality can reduce invasive coronary angiography without revascularization remains unknown. We aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of a dynamic CT-MPI+CCTA-guided versus CCTA-guided strategy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.METHODS: Consecutive patients with intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled and randomized to dynamic CT-MPI+CCTA-guided or CCTA-guided workup. The primary end point was the rate of invasive coronary angiography without revascularization within 3 months. The secondary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac event at the 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up.RESULTS: A total of 240 patients (mean age, 69.01 +/- 11.2 years; 173 men) were included. The total radiation dose and contrast media usage within 90 days were higher in the CT-MPI+CCTA group than in the CCTA group (10.3 versus 7.1 mSv, P=0.031; 134.5 +/- 40.6 versus 108.1 +/- 48.2 mL, P