Ten standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews
Ten standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews
复制标题
对定性研究访谈的十种标准反对
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Kvale
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Kvale
定性研究往往会引起社会科学主流的刻板反对。十个标准化的反应，刺激“定性研究访谈”进行了讨论：它是不科学的，不客观的，不值得信赖的，也不可靠，不主观，不是一个正式的方法，不假设检验，不定量，不概括，不有效。由于对定性访谈的反对意见是高度可预测的，因此在设计、报告和辩护访谈研究时可能会考虑到这些反对意见。作为一个新的定性研究人员的帮助，一些问题，概念和参数所涉及的概述，并讨论了标准的反对意见的相关性。质的研究，来自现象学和诠释学传统的替代概念，建议。在这里，基于对话和互动的定性访谈似乎是一种进入语言构成的社会世界的特权。
Qualitative research has tended to evoke rather stereotyped objections from the mainstream of social science. Ten standardized responses to the stimulus "qualitative research interview" are discussed: it is not scientific, not objective, not trustworthy, nor reliable, not intersubjective, not a formalized method, not hypothesis testing, not quantitative, not generalizable, and not valid. With the objections to qualitative interviews highly predictable, they may be taken into account when designing, reporting, and defending an interview study. As a help for new qualitative researchers, some of the issues, concepts, and arguments involved are outlined, and the relevancy of the standard objections is discussed. Alternative conceptions of qualitative research, coming from phenomenological and hermeneutical traditions, are suggested. The qualitative interview based on conversation and interaction here appears as a privileged access to a linguistically constituted social world.