Conducting Digital Intervention Research among Immigrant Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: Methodological, Safety and Ethnical Considerations.
Conducting Digital Intervention Research among Immigrant Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: Methodological, Safety and Ethnical Considerations.
复制标题
亲密伴侣暴力的移民幸存者之间进行数字干预研究：方法论，安全和种族考虑。
DOI：
10.1007/s10896-022-00405-6
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Murray, Sarah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sabri, Bushra;Saha, Jyoti;Lee, Jennifer;Murray, Sarah
亲密伴侣暴力被联合国描述为全球流行病，人们发现，亲密伴侣暴力对移民妇女的影响尤为严重。由于移民身份、交通和社会隔离等方面的障碍，许多 IPV 的移民幸存者无法或不愿意参加现场服务。通过向遭受虐待的女性提供远程支持，数字干预措施可以帮助解决这些障碍并确保她们的健康和安全。研究为移民 IPV 幸存者提供安全且合乎道德的数字服务方法是满足这些妇女远程支持需求的必要的第一步。这项定性研究的目的是探讨对不同移民妇女群体进行数字干预研究（在线、电话和短信）的考虑因素和挑战。通过 5 个焦点小组和对来自不同原籍国的 IPV 移民幸存者进行 46 次深度访谈收集数据。此外，数据是通过对 17 家服务提供商的关键知情人访谈收集的。参与者分享了获得干预措施时面临的安全、道德和方法方面的挑战，例如施虐伴侣在家或缺乏安全的技术获取途径。此外，参与者还分享了安全数据收集的策略，例如在参与者获得隐私时安排联系时间，以及删除干预证据以保证人身安全。研究结果将为进行数字干预研究的研究人员或对边缘化人群（例如遭受暴力高风险的移民妇女）进行远程干预方法的从业者提供信息。
Intimate partner violence, described as a global pandemic by the United Nations, has been found to disproportionately affect immigrant women. Many immigrant survivors of IPV are unable or unwilling to attend in-person services due to barriers related to immigration status, transportation, and social isolation. By providing remote support to women in abusive relationships, digital interventions can help address these barriers and ensure their health and safety. Research on safe and ethical approaches to digital service delivery for immigrant IPV survivors is a necessary first step to meeting these women’s needs for remote support. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore considerations and challenges of conducting digital intervention research (online, phone and text) with diverse groups of immigrant women. Data was collected via 5 focus groups and 46 in-depth interviews with immigrant survivors of IPV from different countries of origin. In addition, data was collected via key informant interviews with 17 service providers. Participants shared safety, ethical and methodological challenges to accessing interventions, such as their abusive partner being at home or lack of safe access to technology. Further, participants shared strategies for safe data collection, such as scheduling a contact time when participants are afforded privacy and deleting evidence of the intervention to retain personal safety. The findings will be informative for researchers conducting digital intervention studies or practitioners engaging in remote intervention approaches with marginalized populations such as immigrant women at high risk of violence.