Community-based partnered research: new directions in mental health services research.

Community-based partnered research: new directions in mental health services research.
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
M. Alegría;Yuting Wong;N. Mulvaney-Day;Anna Nillni;E. Proctor;M. Nickel;Loretta Jones;B. Green;P. Koegel;A. Wright;K. Wells
M. Alegría;Yuting Wong;N. Mulvaney-Day;Anna Nillni;E. Proctor;M. Nickel;Loretta Jones;B. Green;P. Koegel;A. Wright;K. Wells
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Alegría;Yuting Wong;N. Mulvaney-Day;Anna Nillni;E. Proctor;M. Nickel;Loretta Jones;B. Green;P. Koegel;A. Wright;K. Wells

文献摘要

相似文献

目的:以社区为基础的参与性研究有潜力改善最佳做法的实施,以减少差异,但很少在精神卫生服务研究中得到应用。本文介绍了旨在促进这种应用的全国性会议的内容和经验教训。DESIGN心理健康项目的开发人员合作举办了为期两天的会议,其中包括全体会议和分组会议,分享社区学术伙伴关系发展的方法,以及合作研究的初步结果。由学术和社区会议参与者组成的团队对会议进行录音、转录和分析,以确定有关最佳实践、合作研究面临的挑战以及该领域发展的建议的主题。从会议上的项目描述中选出一些主题来说明。参与者代表来自美国四个人口普查地区的9个学术机构和12个社区机构,是由国家心理健康研究所资助的五个研究中心的学术和社区合作伙伴,也包括来自联邦和非营利资助机构的工作人员。结果:1)伙伴关系建设;2)实施和支持合作研究;3)制定创意传播策略;4)影响评价;5)培训。结论对伙伴关系过程中因素的新认识可以提高精神卫生服务中新干预措施的采用。会议记录表明,这一领域的进一步发展可能有望改善解决精神卫生服务质量鸿沟和服务差距的方法。
OBJECTIVE Community-based participatory research has the potential to improve implementation of best practices to reduce disparities but has seldom been applied in mental health services research. This article presents the content and lessons learned from a national conference designed to stimulate such an application. DESIGN Mental health program developers collaborated in hosting a two-day conference that included plenary and break-out sessions, sharing approaches to community-academic partnership development, and preliminary findings from partnered research studies. Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed and analyzed by teams of academic and community conference participants to identify themes about best practices, challenges faced in partnered research, and recommendations for development of the field. Themes were illustrated with selections from project descriptions at the conference. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants, representing 9 academic institutions and 12 community-based agencies from four US census regions, were academic and community partners from five research centers funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, and also included staff from federal and non-profit funding agencies. RESULTS Five themes emerged: 1) Partnership Building; 2) Implementing and Supporting Partnered Research; 3) Developing Creative Dissemination Strategies; 4) Evaluating Impact; and 5) Training. CONCLUSIONS Emerging knowledge of the factors in the partnership process can enhance uptake of new interventions in mental health services. Conference proceedings suggested that further development of this field may hold promise for improved approaches to address the mental health services quality chasm and service disparities.