Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1704795
复制
发表时间:
2017-08-31
影响因子:
158.5
通讯作者:
Mok, Tony
Mok, Tony
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Peters, Solange;Camidge, D. Ross;Mok, Tony

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Alectinib是一种高度选择性的间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)抑制剂,在治疗ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中显示出全身和中枢神经系统(CNS)疗效。我们调查阿来替尼与克唑替尼相比,在以前未经治疗的,先进的ALK阳性NSCLC患者,包括那些无症状的CNS diseases.METHODSIn一项随机,开放标签,3期试验,我们随机分配303例以前未经治疗的,先进的ALK阳性NSCLC患者接受阿来替尼(600毫克,每日两次)或克唑替尼(250毫克,每日两次)。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期。次要终点是独立审查委员会评估的无进展生存期、CNS进展时间、客观缓解率和总生存期。(克唑替尼)和18.6个月(阿来替尼),Alectinib组62/152例患者(41%)和102/151例患者(68%)发生疾病进展或死亡事件克唑替尼组。阿来替尼治疗组经评估的无进展生存率显著高于克唑替尼治疗组(12个月无事件生存率,阿来替尼组为68.4% [95%置信区间(CI),61.0 - 75.9],克唑替尼组为48.7% [95% CI,40.4 - 56.9];疾病进展或死亡的风险比,0.47 [95% CI,0.34 - 0.65]; P
BACKGROUNDAlectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease.METHODSIn a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival.RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P