Comparative study of photodynamic therapy vs. CO2 laser vaporization in treatment of condylomata acuminata, a randomized clinical trial
Comparative study of photodynamic therapy vs. CO2 laser vaporization in treatment of condylomata acuminata, a randomized clinical trial
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07648.x
复制
发表时间:
2007-03-01
影响因子:
10.3
通讯作者:
Gu, H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen, K.;Chang, B. Z.;Gu, H.
Background Most conventional therapies for condylomata acuminata (CA) are traumatic and have high recurrence rates.Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of topical application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of CA.Methods Sixty-five patients with CA were allocated into the treatment (ALA-PDT) group and treated with 20% ALA solution under occlusive dressing for 3 h followed by irradiation with the helium-neon laser at a dose of 100 J cm(-2) and a power of 100 mW. Another 21 CA patients were allocated into the control group and treated with the CO2 laser. The treatment was to be repeated 1 week later if the lesion was not completely removed after the first treatment.Results After one treatment, the complete removal rate was 95% in the ALA-PDT group and 100% in the control group. After two treatments with ALA-PDT, the complete removal rate in the treatment group was 100%. The recurrence rate for ALA-PDT group was 6.3% which was significantly lower than that in control group (19.1%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the proportion of patients with adverse effects in the ALA-PDT group (13.9%) was also significantly lower than that in control group (100%, P < 0.05). The side-effects in patients treated with ALA-PDT mainly included mild burning and/or stinging restricted to the illuminated area.Conclusions The present study shows that topical application of ALA-PDT is a simpler, more effective and safer therapy with a lower recurrence for treatment of CA compared with conventional CO2 laser therapy.