Irua Ria Atumia and Anti-Colonial Struggles Among the Gĩkũyũ of Kenya: A Counter Narrative on “Female Genital Mutulation” 1
Irua Ria Atumia and Anti-Colonial Struggles Among the Gĩkũyũ of Kenya: A Counter Narrative on “Female Genital Mutulation” 1
复制标题
Irua Ria Atumia 与肯尼亚 Gĩkũyũ 的反殖民斗争:关于“女性生殖器突变”的反叙事 1
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. Njambi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Njambi
The message that is typically conveyed in contemporary discussions of what is now problematically called “female genital mutilation” (FGM) is that these disturbing traditional practices, rooted in the domination of women by men, are a significantly widespread psychological and physical health threat to young women and girls in Africa. Fran Hosken, a persistently vocal critic of such practices since the 1970s, regularly employs terms such as “backward,” “barbaric,” and “primitive” to establish the unacceptability of FGM, a label that she herself coined (e.g., Hosken 1980, 1982, 1993). A host of other authors have since pursued this theme of unacceptability, seeking eradication and agreeing with Hosken that these practices amount to a mutilation not only of genitalia, but also of women’s sexuality. The assumption underlying all is that such harmful practices are vestiges of tradition that have no place in a world that is moving rapidly toward modernization (see, e.g., AAP 1998; AMA 1995; Daly 1978; Dugger 1996; El Dareer 1982; El Saadawi 1980; Equality Now 1996; Hosken 1980, 1982, 1993; Koso-Thomas 1987; Lightfoot-Klein 1989; Rahman and Toubia 2000; Schroeder 1994; Toubia 1993; Walker 1992; Walker and Parmar 1993; WHO 1997); once African women who perform FGM can be taught to see beyond the cultural blinders imposed by their traditions, the story goes, they surely will oppose such barbarity.