Measures of information processing in Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and their relation to reading
Measures of information processing in Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and their relation to reading
复制标题
DOI：
10.1006/jecp.2000.2576
复制
发表时间：
2001-04-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Carlson, CD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Neuhaus, G;Foorman, BR;Carlson, CD
字母、数字。对 50 名一年级和二年级学生进行了物体分测试或快速自动命名测试 (RAN)。学生在三个 RAN 子测试中的表现被录音并进行采集后处理，以区分发音和发音间暂停时间。本研究调查了 (1) 与每个 RAN 子测试的 50 个刺激相关的发音和暂停持续时间之间的关系，以及 (2) 三个 RAN 子测试和阅读的暂停和发音延迟之间的关系。对于一年级和二年级学生来说，RAN 字母和物体的停顿和发音时间没有可靠的相关性。与 RAN 数字发音和暂停持续时间相比，RAN 子测试暂停持续时间与阅读有不同的相关性；然而。发音很少与阅读相关。 RAN 字母暂停时间是解码和阅读理解最稳健的预测因子，一致地预测所有一年级和二年级的测量。分析支持这样的观点，即阅读是通过与字母相关的处理速度而不是一般处理速度来预测的。 (C) 2001 年学术出版社。
The letters, numbers. and objects subtests or the Rapid Automatized Naming Tests (RAN) were given to 50 first- and second-grade students. Student performance on the three RAN subtests were audio taped and subjected to postacquisition processing to distinguish articulation and interarticulation pause times, This study investigated (1) the relations between the articulation and pause durations associated with the 50 stimuli of each RAN subtest and (2) the relations between the pause and articulation latencies of the three RAN subtests and reading. For both first- and second-grade students, pause and articulation times for RAN letters and objects were not found to be reliably related. in contrast to RAN numbers articulation and pause durations, RAN subtest pause durations were differential ly related to reading; however. articulation was rarely related to reading. The RAN letters pause time was the most robust predictor of decoding and reading comprehension, consistently predicting all first- and second-grade measures, Analysis supported the view that reading is predicted by speed of processing associated with letters, not general processing speed. (C) 2001 Academic Press.