Letter by Simpson et al Regarding Article, "Prophylactic Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients".

Letter by Simpson et al Regarding Article, "Prophylactic Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients".
复制标题

辛普森等人关于文章“预防性使用植入式心脏复律除颤器预防透析患者心脏性猝死”的信函。

DOI:
10.1161/circulationaha.119.042788
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
37.8
通讯作者:
Tseng,ZianH
Tseng,ZianH
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Simpson,TimothyF;Salazar,JamesW;Tseng,ZianH

文献摘要

相似文献

流通2019; 140:e742-e743. DOI:10.1161/ARATIONAHA。119.042788 2019年10月29日e743在猝死的金标准评估中,综合尸检评估的充分性和重要性。在随机试验(包括ICD 2试验)中使用共识标准可能导致SCD预防的阴性结果。Jukema等人致力于研究这一重要问题的资源是重要和令人钦佩的。为了在未来的SCD研究中最大限度地增加类似的投资,在可能的情况下,我们主张在随机对照试验中使用尸检来判定SCD结局;在不可行的情况下,我们最近描述了一种算法,该算法可以在这些假定的SCD中识别出更高可能性的尸检死亡。5
Circulation. 2019; 140: e742–e743. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 119.042788 October 29, 2019 e743 fulness and importance of comprehensive postmortem evaluation in the gold standard evaluation of sudden deaths. The use of consensus criteria in randomized trials, including the ICD2 trial, may contribute to negative results in the prevention of SCD. The resources that Jukema et al committed to the study of this important issue are significant and admirable. To maximize similar investments in future studies of SCD, when possible we advocate for the use of autopsy in the adjudication of SCD outcomes in randomized controlled trials; when not feasible, we recently described an algorithm that may identify higher likelihood arrhythmic deaths among these presumed SCDs. 5