No hyperactive-impulsive subtype in teacher-rated attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems
No hyperactive-impulsive subtype in teacher-rated attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00787-006-0572-1
复制
发表时间：
2007-02-01
影响因子：
6.4
通讯作者：
Verhulst, Frank C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
de Nijs, Pieter F. A.;Ferdinand, Robert F.;Verhulst, Frank C.
本研究的目的是调查，根据教师报告表（TRF）上的注意力缺陷/多动症（ADH）问题的教师报告，可以在参考样本（n = 4，422;年龄= 6-18岁;平均年龄= 9.9岁; 66%的男孩，34%的女孩）中确定哪些同质组。对ADH问题进行了潜在类分析（LCA）。此外，在不同的ADH问题组的共病水平进行了比较。LCA产生了三个不同的儿童和青少年的注意力不集中和多动-冲动，和一组高分的注意力不集中，但低分数的多动-冲动。一组患者主要是多动和冲动没有发现。个人在组中具有较高水平的ADH问题有显着较高水平的对立违抗（OD）和行为问题，虽然在较小程度上，显着较高水平的情感和焦虑问题比个人在组中具有较低水平的ADH问题。辨别多动症的多动-冲动型可能没有用。
The aim of this study was to investigate which homogeneous groups, according to teacher reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADH) Problems on the Teacher's Report Form (TRF), can be identified in a referred sample (n = 4,422; age = 6-18 years; mean age = 9.9 years; 66% boys, 34% girls). Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted on ADH Problems. In addition, co-morbidity levels in the different ADH Problems groups were compared. LCA yielded three different groups of children and adolescents with both Inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, and one group with high scores on Inattention but low scores on hyperactivity-impulsivity. A group of patients with predominantly hyperactivity and impulsivity was not found. Individuals in groups with higher levels of ADH Problems had significantly higher levels of oppositional defiant (OD) and conduct problems, and, although to a lesser extent, significantly higher levels of affective and anxiety problems than individuals in groups with lower levels of ADH Problems. It may not be useful to discern the hyperactive-impulsive type of ADHD.