Classifying the findings in qualitative studies
Classifying the findings in qualitative studies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1049732303253488
复制
发表时间：
2003-09-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Barroso, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sandelowski, M;Barroso, J
进行研究整合研究的一项关键任务是确定在符合纳入条件的研究报告中应考虑哪些特征。在方法论项目的过程中，作者发现，无论明示或暗示的参考框架或方法是什么，研究结果的产生和呈现方式都具有显着的一致性。他们描述了一种研究结果的类型学，他们开发这种类型学是为了绕过方法声明与方法的实际使用之间的差异，并努力确定其实用性和可靠性。作者提出，健康领域定性研究期刊报告中的发现可以根据数据转换的连续体分类为无发现、专题调查、专题调查、概念/主题描述或解释性解释。
A key task in conducting research integration studies is determining what features to account for in the research reports eligible for inclusion. In the course of a methodological project, the authors found a remarkable uniformity in the way findings were produced and presented, no matter what the stated or implied frame of reference or method. They describe a typology of findings, which they developed to bypass the discrepancy between method claims and the actual use of methods, and efforts to ascertain its utility and reliability. The authors propose that the findings in journal reports of qualitative studies in the health domain can be classified on a continuum of data transformation as no finding, topical survey, thematic survey, conceptual/thematic description, or interpretive explanation.