Clinical utility of long latency 'cognitive' event-related potentials (P3): the pros.
Clinical utility of long latency 'cognitive' event-related potentials (P3): the pros.
复制标题
长潜伏期“认知”事件相关电位 (P3) 的临床实用性:优点。
DOI:
10.1016/0013-4694(90)90051-k
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Goodin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Goodin
The clinical utility of some electrophysiologic studies such as long latency'cognitive'event-related potentials (ERPs) remains controversial. A number of authors have studied this question but no consensus of opinion had emerged. Most clinical studies on the ERP have been on the P3 or P300 component and my remarks will therefore be confined to a discussion of this component and its clinical role. P3 is an electropositive wave that occurs approximately 300 msec after an infrequently occurring stimulus to which the subject is attending. It has been linked experimentally to such variables as expectancy, task difficulty and memory. Because of this apparent relationship to'cognitive'functions, it has been used to evaluate demented patients in order to distinguish'true'dementia from the pseudodementia that can occur in depression or other psychiatric disorders. Most authors agree that if the P3 response permitted this distinction to be made, the test would be of clinical value. Thus, the controversy that exists relates principally to the reliability of the test in making this distinction. There are many reasons for the differences of opinion regarding the clinical utility of P3, including confusion about what constitutes clinical utility. An instructive example is to compare two
影响因子:
--
作者:
Legatt,AD;Pedley,TA;Emerson,RG;Stein,BM;Abramson,M
通讯作者:
Abramson,M
DOI:
10.1016/0168-5597(88)90049-4
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Patterson,JV;Michalewski,HJ;Starr,A
通讯作者:
Starr,A