Judging Risk
Judging Risk
复制标题
判断风险
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Emma Howarth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Robinson;Emma Howarth
迄今为止，对英国受害者支助工作人员（称为独立家庭暴力顾问或IDVA）的工作实践进行的最大规模研究的数据被用来深入了解家庭暴力案件中如何做出“风险判断”。这项研究使用了2,000多名受害者的数据，发现当风险评分较高时，精算数据和IDVA的风险判断之间存在趋同性，但在风险评分较低的情况下，IDVA经常使用他们的专业判断来升级风险。接下来，我们确定了支持IDVA风险判断的具体因素。与现有的研究一致，我们发现IDVA在形成风险判断时依赖于可用信息的子集，虐待情况的特征，如暴力升级，使用武器，跟踪和重大伤害，对他们来说特别突出。此外，IDVA注意受害者的看法，当他们感到非常害怕或害怕进一步伤害时，IDVA更有可能将他们标记为高风险。虽然我们发现了一些令人鼓舞的重叠之间的子集的因素告知风险的判断和那些与受害者的再虐待在以后的日期，一些显着的差异表明，需要从研究的信息的重要性，特定的风险因素定期加强一线从业人员。
Data from the largest study to date of the working practices of British victim support workers (known as Independent Domestic Violence Advisors or IDVAs) are used to provide insight into how “risk judgments” are made in cases of domestic violence. Using data from more than 2,000 victims, this study found a convergence between actuarial data and IDVAs’ risk judgments when the risk score was high, but in cases with a lower risk score, IDVAs often used their professional judgment to upgrade risk. Next, we identified the specific factors underpinning IDVAs’ risk judgments. Consistent with existing research, we found that IDVAs relied on a subset of available information when forming risk judgments, and characteristics of the abusive situation, such as the escalation of violence, use of weapons, stalking, and significant injuries, were particularly salient to them. Furthermore, IDVAs paid attention to victims’ perceptions and when they felt very frightened or afraid of further injury then IDVAs were more likely to label them as high risk. Although we identified some encouraging overlap between the subset of factors informing risk judgments and those associated with victims’ reabuse at a later date, some notable differences indicate a need for messages from research about the significance of particular risk factors to be reinforced to frontline practitioners on a regular basis.
通过针对遭受虐待伴侣的妇女进行社区宣传来减少暴力。
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Sullivan,CM;Bybee,DI
通讯作者：
Bybee,DI