Editorial introduction to scientific realism quo vadis? Theories, structures, underdetermination and reference

Editorial introduction to scientific realism quo vadis? Theories, structures, underdetermination and reference
复制标题

科学实在论何去何从的社论介绍?

DOI:
10.1007/s11229-009-9610-0
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
I. Votsis
I. Votsis
中科院分区:
人文科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Schurz;I. Votsis

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本特刊中收集的论文是我们于2008年4月11日至12日在杜塞尔多夫大学组织的理论框架和经验欠确定研讨会上发表的演讲的书面版本。早在2007年夏天,我们还沉浸在研讨会的规划阶段。当时,我们主要关注的是邀请那些正在并将继续对科学实在论辩论做出重大贡献的哲学家。考虑到这一目标,我们准备了一份受邀者名单。排在最前面的名字之一是彼得·利普顿。他的工作推断的最佳解释已确立了他作为一个最突出的和可怕的捍卫者的科学实在论。当彼得接受邀请时,我们对讲习班的前景信心大增。唉,这是不应该的。彼得于2007年11月意外去世。他没有参加研讨会是强烈的感觉,尤其是因为相当多的与会者都知道彼得在专业以及个人的基础上。大卫帕皮诺被选为替补。由于大卫与彼得有着悠久而亲密的历史,他被赋予了在研讨会开幕当天发表悼词的光荣任务。我们非常感谢大卫发表了感人的悼词,以及同意在这么短的时间内取代彼得。我们想把这期《综合》特刊献给彼得·利普顿,他是一位哲学家,也是我们中的一些人的亲密朋友。
The papers collected in this special issue are written versions of talks delivered at the Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Underdetermination workshop which we organised at the University of Duesseldorf on April 1 1-12 2008. Early in the summer of 2007 we were still immersed in the planning stages of the workshop. At the time our main concern was to invite philosophers that were making and would continue to make significant contributions to the scientific realism debate. With this aim in mind, we prepared a list of invitees. One of the names at the top was that of Peter Lipton. His work on inference to the best explanation had established him as one of the most prominent and formidable defenders of scientific realism. When Peter accepted the invitation our confidence in the workshop's prospects was greatly enhanced. Alas it was not meant to be. Peter unexpectedly passed away in November 2007. His absence from the workshop was strongly felt not least because quite a few of the participants had known Peter both on a professional as well as on a personal basis. David Papineau was drafted in as a replacement. Since David had a long and entwined history with Peter he was entrusted with the honourable task of delivering a eulogy on the opening day of the workshop. We are very thankful to David for delivering a moving eulogy as well as for agreeing to replace Peter at such short notice. We would like to dedicate this special issue of Synthese to the memory of Peter Lipton, a fellow philosopher and to some of us a dear friend.
无参照的科学现实主义
DOI: 10.4324/9781315185507-9
发表时间: 2002
期刊: American journal of physiology. Renal physiology
影响因子: --
作者:
Pierre Cruse;D. Papineau
通讯作者: D. Papineau
现实主义的问题
DOI: 10.4324/9781315185507
发表时间: 2002
期刊: American journal of physiology. Renal physiology
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Marsonet
通讯作者: M. Marsonet
现实主义关于什么?
DOI: 10.1086/289611
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Roger Jones
通讯作者: Roger Jones