‘Despotism’ and ethical liberal governance
‘Despotism’ and ethical liberal governance
复制标题
“专制主义”和道德自由主义治理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mariana Valverde
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mariana Valverde
最近关于自我的自由实践的福柯理论，虽然创新性地避免了关于个人或集体的本体论预设，但却有将自由伦理治理本身本体化的危险，将其设想为内部一致和自我同一的危险。本文试图通过分析自由主义道德/伦理治理模式的持续共存来证明自由主义伦理治理永远不可能与其自身完全相同。这种共存发生在两个层面上：外部，各种类型的主题和人类经验的各种sapects继续通过实践治理J。密尔会称之为“专制”;在内部，自由主义的典范主体往往通过非自由主义的手段表达他的“激情”，即使他和他的当局都试图最大限度地实现自治和其他自由主义理性。有人认为，共存的矛盾制度的治理：不同的“种”或类型的人类和G…
Recent Foucaulation theorizations of liberal practies of self, while innovatove iv avoiding ontological presuppostions either about individuals or about collectivities, run the danger of ontologizing liberal ethical governance itself, of envisaging it as internally consistent and self-identical. This article seeks to demonstrate that liberal ethical governance can never be identical to itself through an analysis of the persistent coexistance of liberal modes of moral/ethical governance. Such coexistence occurs at two levels: externally, various types of subjects and various sapects of human experience continues to governed through practices J. S. Mill would have called ‘despotic’; internally, the paradigmatic liberal subjects often his ‘passions’ through non-liberal means even as both he and his authorities seek to maximize self-rule and other liberal rationalities. It is argued that the coexistence of contradictory regimes of governance: the naturalization of distinct ‘kinds’ or types of humans and the g...