Once The Shovel Hits the Ground: Evaluating the Management of Complex Implementation Processes of Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects with Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Once The Shovel Hits the Ground: Evaluating the Management of Complex Implementation Processes of Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects with Qualitative Comparative Analysis
复制标题
一旦铲子落地：通过定性比较分析评估公私合作基础设施项目复杂实施流程的管理
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.2646785
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Verweij
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Verweij
公私营伙伴关系基础设施项目的规划受到了很大关注。随后的实施阶段-即合同签署和项目“开始滚动”的阶段-受到的关注较少。然而，项目规划中的良好协议和良好意图很容易在项目实施中失败。实施PPP基础设施项目是复杂的，但这种复杂性意味着什么？项目如何管理，公共和私营伙伴如何合作执行？什么是有效的管理策略，以取得令人满意的结果？这是本论文研究的第一组问题。重要的是，公私伙伴关系基础设施发展的复杂性对可用于研究这些问题的评估方法提出了要求。忽视复杂性的评价方法无法对公私伙伴关系的实施过程产生现实的理解，其结果是，评价几乎不能告诉我们什么可行，什么不可行，在什么情况下，以及为什么。这妨碍了从评价中学习。复杂性评估方法的要求是什么？定性比较分析（QCA）如何满足这些要求？这是本文所要解决的第二组问题。
Much attention is being paid to the planning of public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. The subsequent implementation phase – when the contract has been signed and the project ‘starts rolling’ – has received less attention. However, sound agreements and good intentions in project planning can easily fail in project implementation. Implementing PPP infrastructure projects is complex, but what does this complexity entail? How are projects managed, and how do public and private partners cooperate in implementation? What are effective management strategies to achieve satisfactory outcomes? This is the first set of questions addressed in this thesis. Importantly, the complexity of PPP infrastructure development imposes requirements on the evaluation methods that can be applied for studying these questions. Evaluation methods that ignore complexity do not create a realistic understanding of PPP implementation processes, with the consequence that evaluations tell us little about what works and what does not, in which contexts, and why. This hampers learning from evaluations. What are the requirements for a complexity-informed evaluation method? And how does qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) meet these requirements? This is the second set of questions addressed in this thesis.
复杂性、制度和公共政策：动荡世界中的敏捷决策
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Room Graham
通讯作者：
Room Graham
管理公共服务的复杂性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Haynes, P
通讯作者：
Haynes, P