Self-control depletion and decision making.

Self-control depletion and decision making.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/npe0000047
复制
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Carlos Alós-Ferrer;Sabine Hügelschäfer;Jiahui Li
Carlos Alós-Ferrer;Sabine Hügelschäfer;Jiahui Li
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carlos Alós-Ferrer;Sabine Hügelschäfer;Jiahui Li

文献摘要

相似文献

我们研究自我耗竭的激励决策任务中,最佳决策需要贝叶斯更新的信念的影响。在这个任务中,一个冲动的启发式的启发式可以冲突或与贝叶斯更新。根据自我控制的有限资源模型,耗尽的参与者应该难以抑制启发式,并在冲突的情况下犯更多的决策错误。我们进行了3项研究,使用不同的耗竭操作加上具有较温和版本的对照(作为文献中的标准)。只有一项研究发现了冲突情况下的预测效果。一项研究发现,在对齐的情况下,耗尽的参与者的错误率降低,这与在这种情况下对启发式的依赖增加是一致的。我们的结论是,在复杂的决策任务中的自我控制耗尽的影响是不太系统和鲁棒性比文献中假设的。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2020阿帕,保留所有权利)
We examine the effects of ego depletion on an incentivized decision-making task in which optimal decisions require Bayesian updating of beliefs. In this task, an impulsive reinforcement-based heuristic can either conflict or be aligned with Bayesian updating. According to the limited-resource model of self-control, depleted participants should have difficulties inhibiting the heuristic and commit more decision errors in case of conflict. We conducted 3 studies using different depletion manipulations plus controls with milder versions (as standard in the literature). Only 1 study found the predicted effect in case of conflict. One study found decreased error rates for depleted participants in case of alignment, which is consistent with an increased reliance on the heuristic in this case. We conclude that the effects of self-control depletion in complex decision-making tasks are less systematic and robust than assumed in the literature.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)