A brief motivational interview promotes internal motivation to donate blood among young adults with and without a prior donation history

A brief motivational interview promotes internal motivation to donate blood among young adults with and without a prior donation history
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/trf.14073
复制
发表时间:
2017-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
France, Christopher R.
France, Christopher R.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Livitz, Irina E.;Fox, Kristen R.;France, Christopher R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

招募和留住首次和重复献血者对维持稳定的血液供应至关重要。最近的证据表明,促进内部动机可能是提高捐赠行为的有效策略。我们测试的有效性,在人的动机采访,在增加内部动机和意图donate.Study设计和方法样本219捐助者和nondonators(69.4%女性,平均SD年龄,19.21.1岁,52.1% nondonators)被随机分配到一个动机或知识的采访。在访谈前后,参与者完成了献血意愿的测量和献血者身份调查,这是一个多维度的献血者动机的测量。CAPTSA潜在轮廓分析揭示了三个不同的潜在类别,这被确定为低内部动机,中等内部动机,和高内部动机。从面试前到面试后潜在班级变化的比较显示,与知识面试组相比,动机面试组中更高比例的参与者转向了更具内部动机的班级(即,34% vs. 4%)。此外,相对于知识访谈组,动机访谈组的参与者报告捐赠意愿的增加幅度更大。结论简短的动机访谈可以增强经验丰富的捐赠者和非捐赠者的捐赠意愿和内在动机。
BACKGROUNDRecruitment and retention of first-time and repeat donors is essential to maintain a stable blood supply. Recent evidence has shown that promoting internal motivation may be an effective strategy to enhance donation behavior. We tested the efficacy of an in-person motivational interview at increasing internal motivation and intention to donate.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSA sample of 219 donors and nondonors (69.4% female; meanSD age, 19.21.1 years; 52.1% nondonors) were randomly assigned to either a motivational or a knowledge interview. Immediately before and after the interview participants completed a measure of donation intention and the Blood Donor Identity Survey, which is a multidimensional measure of donor motivation.RESULTSA latent profile analysis revealed three distinct latent classes, which were identified as low internal motivation, mid internal motivation, and high internal motivation. Comparison of change in latent class from pre- to postinterview revealed that a higher proportion of participants in the motivational interview group moved to a more internally motivated class compared to the knowledge interview group (i.e., 34% vs. 4%, respectively). Further, relative to the knowledge interview group, participants in the motivational interview group reported greater increases in intention to donate.CONCLUSIONA brief motivational interview may enhance donation intention and intrinsic motivation among both experienced donors and nondonors alike.